RAM speed and timing questions

aholeinthewor1d

Honorable
May 15, 2012
42
0
10,530
0
I have an Asus P8Z77-V Pro motherboard and the memory supported is 1600MHz and anything higher will have to be overclocked. This is the pair i was looking at

G skill ripjaws x
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231445

Cas Latency: 8
Voltage: 1.5V
Timing: 8-8-8-24

now i know for the most part over 1600 you wont notice a difference but this set of RAM is the exact same price

G skill sniper series
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231460

Cas Latency: 9
Voltage: 1.5V
Timing: 9-10-9-28

so my question is even though the difference is barely noticable should i get the 1866MHz for the same price and when it defaults to 1600 just change it to 1866? and does this mean i would have to up the voltage?

i am also a little confused when it comes to CAS latency and timings..from everything ive read the lower the better...

so i dont really know which would be better in the situation for the same price..

the 1600 MHz CL 8 8-8-8-24
or the
1866 MHz CL 9 9-10-9-28

if someone could please help out id really appreciate it..i know theres a couple different questions in my post so if you know about them feel free to explain everything..thanks
 

willard

Distinguished
Nov 12, 2010
2,346
0
19,960
96
Hard to tell you which would be faster. My DDR3-1333 kit runs at CAS 7, but I can overclock it to DDR3-1600 if I loosen it to CAS 9. Benchmarks show a slight gain in speed at 1600/CAS 9.

For the most part though, there is little benefit to faster memory. You start getting pretty big diminishing returns after DDR3-1600.

If I had to guess, I'd say that the DDR3-1600 at CAS 8 will be within a few percent of the DDR3-1866 at CAS 9, might even be a tad faster.
 

THE UNKNOWN

Honorable
Apr 20, 2012
917
0
11,060
29
Imo Take 1600mhz instead 1866mhz cause of timings

Here's Another for $54

CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB (2 x 4GB)
Cas Latency: 9
Timing: 9 9-9-9-24
Voltage: 1.5

www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233144
 

jbseven

Distinguished
Dec 2, 2011
646
0
19,160
74
to help you understand, ddr3 1333mhz at cas 7 is identical in performance to a fictional ddr3 2666mhz at cas 14.

since there's little difference between the two in terms of performance, if i were u, id go with the 1866 as it is tested at a higher frequency and will (potentially) give me better overclocks. if i hit a snag in overclocking due to the ram, i can always underclock the ram to 1600 in order to reach a higher cpu overclock.
 

noreaster

Honorable
May 30, 2012
276
0
10,860
39
ddr3 1333mhz at cas 7 is identical in performance to a fictional ddr3 2666mhz at cas 14.
Okay, lets introduce some math...if performance is a ratio of MHz/CL as suggested above by jbseven.

Then 1600MHz/8CL=200PP (performance points)
and 1866MHz/9CL=207.33333PP


Following this to its logical conclusion, shopping for RAM by this method, I browsed Newegg for 8GB (2x4GB) dual channel kits and ran the numbers:
For best PP/Dollar:
Team Xtreem LV Series at 1600MHz/7CL=228.56PP @ $52= 4.4PP/Dollar

For most PP overall:
Team Xtreem LV Series at 2400MHz/9CL=266.666PP @ $130=2.05PP/Dollar

So in your case I would actually recommend the Team Xtreem 1600MHz.
 

jbseven

Distinguished
Dec 2, 2011
646
0
19,160
74
I wouldnt go with the team extreme unless it was in the supported memory list for ur board simply because ive never used them and the one reviewer on newegg said 'go with something more reliable'.
i doubt u'd have compatibility issues with corsair, g.skill, etc.
 

noreaster

Honorable
May 30, 2012
276
0
10,860
39
My assessment was purely based on the MHz/CL/USD ratio and did not take any brand or review into consideration. By large, most RAM that fits withing the specifications required by the motherboard (DDR3 1066/1333/1600/1866(OC)/etc) will work, not to say that there may be instances where it doesn't. If it were my money I was spending I would chose a brand that I am familiar with.
 

InvalidError

Titan
Moderator

Between 1GHz and 2GHz DDR3, most real-world benchmarks only show ~2% performance improvement so RAM performance is not really worth worrying about. Which of the two would be best also varies depending on what sort of access patterns are predominant in the games and applications you use most. Code with a largely linear structure like video processing would benefit most from higher bandwidth while highly conditional code like compilers would benefit more from low latency. Games are mixed bags of linear geometry/physics processing and conditional AI/control/script code which makes the answer a case-by-case thing.

Either way, the difference will be slim. I personally would pick lower latency at 1600MHz.
 

Similar threads


ASK THE COMMUNITY