Rambus Lensless Smart Sensor: A Tiny Image Sensor Designed for IoT

[alex davies]

At MWC 2015, Rambus is showcasing its Lensless Smart Sensor, a tiny, no bigger than a human hair, image sensor designed for Internet of Things devices.

Rambus Lensless Smart Sensor: A Tiny Image Sensor Designed for IoT : Read more

 

[tburns1]

But of course, any images the sensor takes of you will be considered their IP. Any subsequent pictures you take of yourself will be considered patent infringement and YOU WILL BE SUED! I wonder if they will try to patent light itself ...

 

[derekullo]

Apple already sued light after it bounced off the original iPhone without paying royalties.

 

[warezme]

How did Rambus go from a patent troll that produced nothing and earning cash from law suites to making something? Did they buy a company with all their ill gotten booty.

 

[ethanolson]

Diffraction grating on this thing means that it has an aperture that's nasty for low-light. I'm talking like f/150. Whatever. Well... it's cool to see innovation. I hope they learned form the past and will let the innovation thrive instead of stupid lawsuit crap.

 

[bit_user]

How did Rambus go from a patent troll that produced nothing and earning cash from law suites to making something?

Whatever. Well... it's cool to see innovation. I hope they learned form the past and will let the innovation thrive instead of stupid lawsuit crap.

Why do you assume they're no longer interested in monetizing IP in any way possible? They milked the memory industry for a long time and seem to have decided to branch out into other fertile markets. They actually have their fingers in a lot of pies, like LED lighting.

I think they probably fall somewhere in between an IP factory, like Intellectual Ventures, and a traditional semiconductor company. Take their LED lighting products, for instance. They don't do the manufacturing - just produce the designs. They then license those designs to other manufacturers who want to make them. And I'm sure they're busily suing companies they feel infringe on those designs, as well.

I'll be interested in seeing whether they continue to develop further lensless sensors, or whether this product satisfies their need to extract "value" from that market.

That said, I'm impressed with what they've done, here. Their LED lights seem pretty nice, too.

 

[Solandri]

How did Rambus go from a patent troll that produced nothing and earning cash from law suites to making something? Did they buy a company with all their ill gotten booty.

The principle behind this is nearly two hundred years old. In fact if you learned about Fourier transforms in school, you were probably taught this as an example. When light coming in from a window hits a wall, the light pattern on the wall is basically the Fourier transform of the image visible through the window. If you could take that light pattern on the wall and apply another Fourier transform (FTs are reversible this way), you'd get back the original image (i.e. the scene outside the window). Presto - a lensless camera.

The tricky part is, in order to take the Fourier transform of the light hitting the wall, the intensity (brightness) is not enough. You also need the phase of the light when it hits the wall. Capture that phase information, and you've basically got a lens-less camera. Everyone has been trying to figure out a way to do just that. Lytro's light field camera more or less does it by capturing light re-focused by microlenses in extremely high resolution after the focal plane, then using that data to compute the intensity and phase of light as it was crossing the focal plane. That's how you can refocus the image after the "photo" is taken - you just recompute it with the focal plane at a different location.

As computing power advances, people are probably going to come up with dozens if not hundreds of different ways to do this. So it's highly unlikely that Rambus' way will be THE way it's done in the future. The bigger risk is they'll get an overreaching patent which gives them control of a huge area of research that they haven't done and thus have no legitimate right to.

I'm not even sure this is the direction photography is going to go anymore. 10 years ago I would've said definitely. But the intervening decade has seen regular cameras and sensors shrink so much, now you can just put two or more cameras on a phone, have them take photos simultaneously, and have a computer use parallax in the pictures to pull out depth information and recreate the original scene in 3D.

 

[synphul]

Just what society was missing, more cameras. Seriously, it states the usage goal geared to IoT. Why exactly does my new age fridge need a photo of me? To send it to the toaster when my back is turned and snicker over my expanding waistline? I dunno about everyone else, but I'm getting sick of camera/mic infused devices spying on me every time I turn around. I'm all for tech but not at the expense of privacy.

 

[OrumusST]

On a technological point of view I find the forward momentum created by the drive towards the IoT great. However the easier and cheaper it is to embed senors of every kind into everyday innocuous objects means we are also moving towards a future where privacy does not exist.
I am uncertain if we as a society will be able to use this power without stamping out individual freedoms. As of right now I know we can not as is proved with every leak about governments spying on citizens and companies trying to monetize everything.
The IoT could be an extremely helpful tool or a tool for control and oppression.

 

[falchard]

Something tells me that chip is actually just a copper model that does not do anything, and they copyrighted the idea of creating a lens-less sensor. So from now on everyone has to uses a lens in sensors or pay Rambus money.