resolution 1600x900What is your monitor's resolution and refresh rate?
SO DO YOU THINK 1600 suitable for me !Because you're running games at such a low resolution, you will be cpu bound. For that reason i'd opt for the 2600.
SO DO YOU THINK 1600 suitable for me !
do you think 8% worth to pay this 33 euro extra thanksNO. The 2600 is about 8% faster than the 1600. This will give you a bit more headroom in games.
The answer will obviously depends on the financial situation of the answerer, so its pretty subjective. For me it would be worth it, but on a tight budget where 33 euro is 1/3-1/4 of the price of CPU, the perf/price ratio is pretty abysmal.do you think 8% worth to pay this 33 euro extra thanks
thanks i live in africa The rate of income here is poor so I focused on the priceUbisoft recommends 1400 and gtx 970, either processor and your gpu are above those specs, either will suffice. 1600 is roughly 20% more powerful than the 1400, 2600 is roughly 10% more powerful than 1600.
But based on your other post, you want the 2600. Dont dupe posts again.
Also 33euros is quite a bit considering its 31 aud difference here, and euros are worth far more
igot 2600x for 121 dollar used what do yo thinksIf you plan to upgrade within 1-2 years go 1600, otherwise 2600
You probably dont have a big selection to choose from where you live i presume? If so then thats a good deal.igot 2600x for 121 dollar used what do yo thinks
ibuy from aliexpress in my contry 2600 cost 180 euroYou probably dont have a big selection to choose from where you live i presume? If so then thats a good deal.
ibuy from aliexpress in my contry 2600 cost 180 euroGiven your location, probably not a bad price. The non x 2600 sells for $130, and the 2600x sells for $150, new, in the US.
algeriaWhat country is that? They sure cost less, than that, in Germany.
https://de.pcpartpicker.com/products/cpu/#sort=price&s=60