ReadyBoost After a Restart

[nonxcarbonx]

If you dedicate a usb drive to readyboost, and restart or shutdown, when you are back up, does the computer recognized again that you've allocated that drive to readyboost, or do you have to reinsert it and dedicate it again?

 

[r_manic]

AFAIK Windows remembers what drive you've used, so you won't have to dedicate it again. In any case however, my experience with Readyboost has been... nothing's improved at all.

And with your system, do you really need a boost? 😛

 

[nonxcarbonx]

I agree, I tried running a superpi and I didn't get any better times, but of coarse I'm not sure that that is the best benchmark. It seems like web pages are loading a bit faster, but that could very well be my imagination.

 

[geofelt]

If you dedicate a usb drive to readyboost, and restart or shutdown, when you are back up, does the computer recognized again that you've allocated that drive to readyboost, or do you have to reinsert it and dedicate it again?

Yes, it is recognized. No special action is necessary. The readyboost drive has a hash code written to it which must match what is stored on the OS drive. When vista wants to use the ready boost drive, the codes must match, or the OS concludes that the drive has been removed and that the data may not be accurate.

Readyboost is really not that helpful, and it is often misunderstood.
It is simple enough. You take a suitably fast usb drive, and allocate up to 4gb of it to ready boost.
Vista will then look for small modules that it can load faster from a usb drive than it can from the underlying hard drive.
A usb drive has minimal access time, but the data transfer time is much longer than from a hard drive.
Vista will create a list of those modules that you use, and pre-load them on to the readyboost drive.

When you need such a module, it will fetch it from the ready boost drive. If the module is updated, it will be written to both places.
If you unplug the usb stick, the official data is still on the hard drive.

It is not that helpful because it improves the fetch time of small modules only, and they already took minimal time.

Still, it doesn't hurt.

It is NOT any kind of a substitute for ram or a paging device.