Hello guys,
I am currently building a gaming rig using GTX 1070 and an Intel (i5 or i7) CPU. I want the system to stay usable for at least 3 years performing 1080p@60. I won't overclock, just use stock power (both CPU and GPU)
One game I plan on playing is Battlefield 1 (when it is out, ofc) and so I was looking at its requirements, which can be seen here on their website: https://www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1/tech
Take a look the minimum required CPU, and then at the recommended CPU. The minimum CPU is a 2015 Skylake i5 6600K, and the recommended is a 2014 i7 4790. According to benchmarks the i5 is faster, yet cheaper. And this confuses me, I mean how is this possible? How can the minimum part be better than the recommended?
I was going to buy that i5 6600K but when I saw this, I started considering an i7 6700. Which one should I buy?
I am currently building a gaming rig using GTX 1070 and an Intel (i5 or i7) CPU. I want the system to stay usable for at least 3 years performing 1080p@60. I won't overclock, just use stock power (both CPU and GPU)
One game I plan on playing is Battlefield 1 (when it is out, ofc) and so I was looking at its requirements, which can be seen here on their website: https://www.battlefield.com/games/battlefield-1/tech
Take a look the minimum required CPU, and then at the recommended CPU. The minimum CPU is a 2015 Skylake i5 6600K, and the recommended is a 2014 i7 4790. According to benchmarks the i5 is faster, yet cheaper. And this confuses me, I mean how is this possible? How can the minimum part be better than the recommended?
I was going to buy that i5 6600K but when I saw this, I started considering an i7 6700. Which one should I buy?