(Redemption) Response Time Test

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.misc (More info?)

Hey,

I've noticed that we haven't been very active on this newsgroup very much. I
have a quick Q. If you know the answer, please post it, if not, post that
you don't know. If the answer is already there, still please post. I will
then average the results and post the data that will tell us how long we
have to wait to get a good answer.

Q1: If Captain of the Host makes a rescue attempt, and Ananias (who then
bands to Sapphira) blocks, can CotH play a banding card?

BobBobBob

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.misc (More info?)

This is not the Word From On High (aka Cactus), but as a judge I would rule
this way:

CotH negates all SAs except those that cannot be negated. Therefore, he
prevents Sapphira's SA, so she cannot negate banding. So CotH can play a
banding card.

CotH vs. Sapphira is a "paper vs. paper" situation in 3e rule terms. There is
an example (p. 57) of CotH preventing King of Tyrus, which would be the same
kind of situation.

Steve "Polycarp" Braun
Redemption New Jersey - http://ddicerc.tripod.com
"We may throw the dice, but the Lord determines how they fall." Prov. 16:33,
NLT
(To reply via e-mail, remove "nospam" from the address above.)

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.misc (More info?)

Thanks,

The first response time was 2 hours and 35 minutes, very good.

Remeber anyone else on the newsgroup, reply even though it was already
answered.

BobBobBob
"DDiceRC" <ddicerc@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20041021134542.22732.00002436@mb-m15.aol.com...
> This is not the Word From On High (aka Cactus), but as a judge I would
> rule
> this way:
>
> CotH negates all SAs except those that cannot be negated. Therefore, he
> prevents Sapphira's SA, so she cannot negate banding. So CotH can play a
> banding card.
>
> CotH vs. Sapphira is a "paper vs. paper" situation in 3e rule terms. There
> is
> an example (p. 57) of CotH preventing King of Tyrus, which would be the
> same
> kind of situation.
>
> Steve "Polycarp" Braun
> Redemption New Jersey - http://ddicerc.tripod.com
> "We may throw the dice, but the Lord determines how they fall." Prov.
> 16:33,
> NLT
> (To reply via e-mail, remove "nospam" from the address above.)

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.misc (More info?)

I concur with Steve. A banding card can be played by Captain.

Blessings,
DJ

"Bob Bolender III" <Bob_the_Third@grandecom.net> wrote in message
news:10ng8lcn9h0ls18@corp.supernews.com...
> Thanks,
>
> The first response time was 2 hours and 35 minutes, very good.
>
> Remeber anyone else on the newsgroup, reply even though it was already
> answered.
>
> BobBobBob
> "DDiceRC" <ddicerc@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
> news:20041021134542.22732.00002436@mb-m15.aol.com...
>> This is not the Word From On High (aka Cactus), but as a judge I would
>> rule
>> this way:
>>
>> CotH negates all SAs except those that cannot be negated. Therefore, he
>> prevents Sapphira's SA, so she cannot negate banding. So CotH can play a
>> banding card.
>>
>> CotH vs. Sapphira is a "paper vs. paper" situation in 3e rule terms.
>> There is
>> an example (p. 57) of CotH preventing King of Tyrus, which would be the
>> same
>> kind of situation.
>>
>> Steve "Polycarp" Braun
>> Redemption New Jersey - http://ddicerc.tripod.com
>> "We may throw the dice, but the Lord determines how they fall." Prov.
>> 16:33,
>> NLT
>> (To reply via e-mail, remove "nospam" from the address above.)
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.misc (More info?)

Second Response time: 6 days, 14 hours, 46 minutes.

Thanks

"darcyj2" <darcyj2@lexcominc.netnospam> wrote in message
news:clqm1d$bo4d$1@news3.infoave.net...
>I concur with Steve. A banding card can be played by Captain.
>
> Blessings,
> DJ
>
> "Bob Bolender III" <Bob_the_Third@grandecom.net> wrote in message
> news:10ng8lcn9h0ls18@corp.supernews.com...
>> Thanks,
>>
>> The first response time was 2 hours and 35 minutes, very good.
>>
>> Remeber anyone else on the newsgroup, reply even though it was already
>> answered.
>>
>> BobBobBob
>> "DDiceRC" <ddicerc@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
>> news:20041021134542.22732.00002436@mb-m15.aol.com...
>>> This is not the Word From On High (aka Cactus), but as a judge I would
>>> rule
>>> this way:
>>>
>>> CotH negates all SAs except those that cannot be negated. Therefore, he
>>> prevents Sapphira's SA, so she cannot negate banding. So CotH can play a
>>> banding card.
>>>
>>> CotH vs. Sapphira is a "paper vs. paper" situation in 3e rule terms.
>>> There is
>>> an example (p. 57) of CotH preventing King of Tyrus, which would be the
>>> same
>>> kind of situation.
>>>
>>> Steve "Polycarp" Braun
>>> Redemption New Jersey - http://ddicerc.tripod.com
>>> "We may throw the dice, but the Lord determines how they fall." Prov.
>>> 16:33,
>>> NLT
>>> (To reply via e-mail, remove "nospam" from the address above.)
>>
>>
>
>