Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.dcameras (
More info?)
Thanks for posting this.
I feel that these people you speak of, are morally bankrupt.
Some people have something I call character. Others don't.
Pj
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 16:09:11 GMT, "John@Smith.com"
<xxxxspud@newscene.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 02 Aug 2004 20:37:33 GMT, Frogleg <frogleg@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>Why are there so many refurbished cameras on eBay (and elsewhere, I
>>suppose)? Are they so prone to breakig that there are always thousands
>>being sent back to the manufacturer? This is not very
>>confidence-inspiring.
>
>Possibly but in the past a lot of people were trying out cameras and
>then returning them. In fact it got so bad that my local Compusa and
>other places were really really tight about accepting returns.
>
>Similar to the restocking fee situation with PC parts. In the mid 90s
>a Computer City opened up in my city , right before they were taken
>over by Compusa. I used to go and there would long lines of people
>returning stuff. The guy in front of me was returning a $3k notebook
>and zip drive and other stuff he had used for a two weeks. When asked
>what was wrong with it , he got indignant and said he just didnt like
>it. And then he ran off to try some other stuff.
>
>I also had a friend who was in college and was too poor to afford lots
>of things so he would just buy them and try them out and ten return
>them for a kick. Of course every place has restocking fees now so its
>not worth it now.
>
>Also cameras can be damaged fairly easily by dropping them etc. And if
>there are no visible marks Im sure many people have returned them. I
>returned a Toshiba once and was surprised they accepted it when I said
>the battery cover latch broke. They accepted it no questions asked and
>sent me a brand new one since it was a new model. There are lots of
>reasons including legit ones.
>
>I remember Oly 700 series zooms. The 2100 got rave reviews the one
>with stabilzation. They all tended to be expensive the big zooms. When
>the 700 came out it seems like a lot of people tried them and when
>several reviews came out talking about the chromatic aberration
>problem - seems like a lot of people returned it. At the time it
>seemed like a few reviews made it seem like the new 700 series was
>exceptionally bad but later I saw other cameras which were pointed out
>to have moderate CA. I suddenly saw lots of 700 refurbs at various
>places. But then they seemed to dry up after the other reviews pointed
>out lots of cameras had moderate amounts of CA.
>