Archived from groups: alt.games.champ-man (
More info?)
"The Wielder of the Scythe" <scytheNOSPAMWIBBLE@netvigator.com> wrote in
message news:427B98E0.92506FE1@netvigator.com...
> Hari Seldon wrote:
>
>> "Qwerty" <schachmal@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
>> news:427b4588_1@news.chariot.net.au...
>> > Is it worth sending a player to surgery? Sometimes it doesn't seem to
>> > work
>> > and also I'm afraid it might be doing more harm in some cases.
>> > Are there certain injuries that should beleft alone?
>>
>> IMHO, only when it lasts longer than 6 months you could sent them - it
>> can
>> shorten it two months and vice versa... else it has no effect.
>
> In theory, for injuries that have a potential to be recurring (e.g. groin,
> spine
> etc. See the values in the pre-game editor for a run-down of which is
> which.),
> it is much safer to send someone to rehab even if it means gambling on the
> treatment being longer than the actual injury. It will help forestall a
> recurrence perhaps during a critical time of a campaign.
>
> [Based on CM0304]
> Assuming FM is not like the older incarnations of the game, SI have got
> the
> rehab+injury bug sort of fixed, then you won't have the scenario whereby a
> player coming right out of a long rahab instantly gets the same injury
> DURING
> training (never in a match). Instantly as within the same hour of the news
> item
> announcing his recovery; regularly.
> Assuming such, then, the above advice would hold true. If they have not
> got it
> fixed, it is rather pointless to go for a rehab, except, to chance it to
> have
> the treatment time shorter than the injury.
>
it wasn't quite bug, but AI ALWAYS insisted playing not fit players(one or
even two months till recovery) and they get the same injury over and over
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram