Payment plans for repair shops? I would not be unhappy if Intel made the most remotely repairable PC's on the market. Intel AMT is a great way to do this.
Yes, in other words,
how would a repair tech charge a customer, and both sides feeling safe doing so on a first time basis ?
On one hand, you have the customer feeling unsafe, because they might have to give CC info out first, and the repair tech would then charge a minimum fee, after which the tech might refund some of the charges to reflect the time spent actually repairing the PC.
On the other hand, the tech lets the 'charge' float, until he/she is done, then billing the customer after repairs are complete, not knowing if the customer will make good on the bill or not.
Anyhow, it was kind of a joke, with a little dreaming on my behalf, in that you could implement some form of a billing system in the NVRAM
I have however given some serious thought, as to how system integrators could make the most of this, in more than one aspect, not just the OS/Software repair level. IE, small PC shops could tout having systems that are as reliable as possible, but if problems do arise, can be fixed in a hurry, remotely, possibly for free within the warranty time, or a fee after words. Large businesses, such as Dell, or HP may be able to do so as well, however, being in the business myself, I
know how 'good' teir 2 support through OEMs can be . . . I honestly do not think they could afford the proper technitians for such a venture, and would probably have to find a contractor, who would in turn contact someone like us here (much like how things are done now, but without the driving costs/charges).
So, when all is said and done, hourly rates would be the same (or maybe prices would have to be jacked up a tad to make sure the technitians had the proper internet connection), but driving costs/charges would be eliminated, not to mention the 'green' factor as well.
As an example, we often get Virus/malfunctioning OS calls, our rates are $50/hour, minimum charge is 30 minutes time ($25), and driving time (local) is another minimum 30 minutes. That would be $50 just for us to show up, and say something like 'yeah, it is definately broken . . .'. Half that cost would be eliminated if AMT were up to the task right_now, and in most machines. Now imagine the calls we get similar to this, but are infact 2 hours away, thats $100 just to show up . . .
That being said, we are very fair with our customers, in how we charge them for actual time spent working on a PC (IE, if MSUpdates are downloading, the PC is being 'fixed', but the technitian may be doing something else), so we do not charge for the full time the PC has been in our shop, and on the bench, but we will charge full time spent on a house call. Which gives me another idea, how about a watchdog feature, that keeps track of remote interrection done by the user ? Something along the line of, start times/end times, and idle times after a minute or so. This would be really handy to help determine how long one actually spent on a machine. For more suggestions, please insert another $25 usd
Kidding . . .