REMOVING THE RAM BARRIER IN XP SP2 32bit

Status
Not open for further replies.

vampm

Distinguished
Aug 18, 2010
80
0
18,630
Hi guys! I know that this is a weird conversation, but after reading many articles it seems that the <4gb ram barrier in 32bit win xp is not a physical limitation, but a deliberately action. I know that this barrier is hard-coded in sp2 (but I dont know what happened in xp (no sp) ).

First of all, I will say it nice, plz don start with "install win 7" or "win 7 are better" and such stuff. I LIKE WIN XP, I USE WIN XP. Thats all you need to know. Also, I would use xp 64bit, but that version of xp is not "xp" like, but server 03 like, and has many problems. So plz, don argue with me in these, it will be a waste of time.

Back in the topic, I know the sollution of ramdisk, but I dont want this. I want to see xp sp2 32bit to have 8gb of ram.

I read numerous times about PAE, but many say that it does nothing. Also I know that with PAE there might be issues with drivers, but I don care about this.

So, what do you know on this? Is there any way? I read somewhere that someone knew about a patch or somthing but he didnt had it..
 

Just to be clear, 32-bit Windows Server editions have used PAE to support more than 4GB of memory by enabling 4GB per process. For example, Windows 2000 Advanced Server could access 8GB of memory, and 2000 Datacenter Sever could access 32GB. Some later versions could access up to 128GB of RAM!
 



Done through page flipping. Actual address space never exceeds 4GB.
 
Well, in vista and 7 there is a patch that does this job, so there must be something in xp too. There is no question about it; as phillfrisbie said, 32bit server editions suppport more than 4gb.

As for the actual address space, you mean how much ram a single process can allocate, right? If so, then thats fine for me. I have many different programs open at a time that require lots of memory (ie firefox by itself, with many tabs needs lot of ram, very close to 2gb)

I read that its possible if you take a (kernel?) file from from server 2k3, hack it, recreate the checksum and put it in xp, but thats all that the guy said, if I remeber correct. I still search for that post, cant find it... As phillfrisbie again said, its doable through mod of kernel. How to do it?
 

Yes, it allows each process to have a 4GB address space. Also, it takes time to change address spaces, so switching between processes is slow compared to a normal thread context switch.
 
Not dead fro me. I dont want to change the subject of the conversation, but I know that there is a fix for this, and I wont stop seeking it. Even in win7 32 bit there is a patcher that "removes" tha "artifitial" barrier.

So plz just stay on the subject. There is a way, and its of utmost importance to me.
 
vampm

Be nice. Some very knowledgeable people have stated that the 4 GB limit in 32-bit OSes is a hard limit, and cannot be bypassed except when... as above. It is also a licensing issue, according to some information that I have seen, and we cannot discuss bypassing licensing restrictions.

I suggest that you Google "8 GB on 32-bit". you will find things like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcDs4UvmfuE . Otherwise, the general opinion seems to be that you need a 64-bit OS or the PAE feature available only in server OSes. For example, this discussion: http://superuser.com/questions/72655/8gb-ram-on-xp-professional . Some of the links are interesting.
 
I read that its possible if you take a (kernel?) file from from server 2k3, hack it, recreate the checksum and put it in xp, but thats all that the guy said, if I remeber correct. I still search for that post, cant find it... As phillfrisbie again said, its doable through mod of kernel. How to do it?

Tom's Hardware doesn't provide help to hack Microsoft Software.
 
Welcome to the Tom's Hardware forums. Here we talk about computer hardware, software, gadgets, gaming, and geekery in general. Speech is free but Tom's Hardware is moderated. We like people who make sense, stay-on-topic, and play nice.


Tom's Hardware Rules of Conduct


The Rules of Conduct are general guidelines for regular users on acceptable behavior in the Tom's Hardware forums. These guidelines may change at the discretion of the Community Manager as necessary to foster an environment appropriate to civil discourse. This outline is a basic set of guidelines and does not encompass every foreseeable event, and individual infractions will be dealt with by moderators on a per incident basis. The Community Manager and Moderation Team has sole discretion on how to interpret and apply these rules to circumstances and situations, including discipline or exception. The Rules of Conduct also include adherence to Tom's Hardware website Terms of Service, located at http://www.tomshardware.com/terms.html.


Do...

Search the forums. Someone else may have already answered your question/discussed the topic.
Read the stickies. They answer a lot of questions, and are great reads too!
Use paragraphs, and avoid walls of text that are hard to read.
Provide details on what is going wrong, and how. Share your hardware specs and OS, when applicable.
Keep criticism constructive. Attack the idea, not the person.
Check out our guide to posting images and styling your posts. You can also see how other users do the same by clicking "BBCode" above their post.
Report violators to the Moderation Team by clicking "Report" above the post.


Don't...

Post in ALL CAPS or use excessive punctuation!!!
Share personal information, like your email address. Identify theft is real.
Bump posts, claim "first!"
Hijack a topic. Stick to the original conversation.
Ask for help pirating, cracking passwords, or bypassing copyright protection


Signatures

An imported signature banner shall be no larger than 75 x 400 size, and you will be allowed to display only one banner.
If the banner contains forwarding links to either past or present websites that have caused problems at THGF, your signature privileges will be suspended.


Violations - It violates the Tom's Hardware Rules of Conduct if you engage in any of the following activity:

Post, promote or distribute any content that is illegal.
Promote or encourage activity which is illegal, such as hacking, cracking, scamming.
Harass, threaten, embarrass or insult other users, including sending unwanted messages, attacking race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc. Ad hominem attacks are not permitted.
Hate speech is not permitted. You may not post or distribute content that is harmful, abusive, racist, homophobic, sexually explicit, defamatory, infringing, invasive of privacy, or objectionable.
Disrupt the natural flow of forum discussion through vulgar language, spamming, flooding, or any variant.
Trolling, defined as knowingly soliciting strong negative responses simply for shock value.
Posting off-topic posts in inappropriate forums.
Impersonation.
Phishing. A moderator will never ask for your password.
Upload or link to files which contain a virus or malware.
Make posts to advertise or promote, forward chain letters, pyramid schemes or multi-level marketing programs.


Two more things: Forum accounts are non-transferable. Actions taken by a user on one account may affect all of that user's accounts.


With these in mind, please remember to have fun. Most of these guidelines are common sense, and serve to keep the forums useful for everyone. We thank you for your cooperation and support in this, and if you have any suggestions or feedback regarding the Rules of Conduct, please contact a Moderator.


Thanks for being a part of the Tom's Hardware Community!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.