Intel will reportedly launch its "ATX12VO" design specification, with the "O" standing for "Only."
Report: 12V-Only Power Supply Spec Launching This Year : Read more
Report: 12V-Only Power Supply Spec Launching This Year : Read more
The scheduled forum maintenance has now been completed. If you spot any issues, please report them here in this thread. Thank you!
OEMs have been doing this for years... at least HP has. In the short term I don't think it actually saved them any money, as the mainboard supplied the other voltages, so the circuitry was just moved to the motherboard. In the longer term, yeah it should save them a little bit, as they eradicate any need for legacy voltages/devices.Initially, the transition will only hit system integrators, so the DIY space will likely continue using the existing 12V ATX design for quite some time.
The idea behind ATX12VO is that it ditches the 3.3V and 5V rails, leaving the power supply's only job as to provide 12V to the system's components. This simplifies the power circuitry design and, thus, lowers the production cost of components.
OEMs have been doing this for years... at least HP has. In the short term I don't think it actually saved them any money, as the mainboard supplied the other voltages, so the circuitry was just moved to the motherboard. In the longer term, yeah it should save them a little bit, as they eradicate any need for legacy voltages/devices.
I guess eventually we'll get to that point in the DIY market, and when we need 5V or 3.3 we'll have to use adapters that have built-in step downs or something. But that probably will take years.
Side note, I hope OEMs adopt the 12VO standard instead of the proprietary crap. Using standard PSUs as replacements in certain OEM boxes has been annoying for years, in many cases I've had to either use adapters, or cut and splice.
Do you even understand what you are writing about? First of all, nowhere USB specification even mentions power voltages besides 5V. It's either proprietary extensions that are going to die soon or USB-PD. And with USB-PD any other voltage besides 5V are, surprise, optional addition to 5V.Moreover, various USB devices are also slowly starting to adopt 12V as their input voltage to speed up charging, and chances are that there will be a day when all new USB devices are built on using 12V rather than 5V.
External interfaces will have to go optical at some point due to how difficult it becomes to maintain signal integrity through multiple connectors and cables of non-trivial length. I wouldn't be surprised if USB5 introduced an optical connector spec with 12V default voltage.So, 'USB' device that require 12V won't work with almost all current hardware and even then will need to negotiate 12V over 5V power first.
yeap we don't need any of those legacy power connectors, the vast majority need more m.2 slots and that's it
For DIY though even with a 12VO PSU, you'll still have extra connectors that do NOT run through the mainboard. They'll just be 12V only. So there's no need to worry... if you have hardware that runs at 5V, for example, you could use external step-downs. It could be a board that has multiple connectors, or inline "line lump" adapters.On the main stream/custom side I don't want that to ever dissapear. Some of us still run multiple hard drives ( I have 12!) and i just don't see all those amps being able to go though the motherboard.
Perhaps, but not for like keyboards, mice, sound devices, or a plethora of other USB-based peripherals and devices.External interfaces will have to go optical at some point
yeap we don't need any of those legacy power connectors, the vast majority need more m.2 slots and that's it
Most of the "plethora of other devices" I can think of beyond thumb-drives are higher power than what can comfortably be delivered over 5V USB and have to be self-powered.Perhaps, but not for like keyboards, mice, sound devices, or a plethora of other USB-based peripherals and devices.
I mean... why? Seriously that's a lot of bandwidth, especially on a PCIe 4.0+ platform. You're proposing a large price hike for motherboards and processors, that would impact everyone in the mainstream. The ones who need all those lanes can pay for it themselves - in other words, If you really need that many PCIe lanes, you need to get a HEDT platform.That and another 40+ PCI-e lanes on the CPU or motherboard.
I mean... why? Seriously that's a lot of bandwidth, especially on a PCIe 4.0+ platform. You're proposing a large price hike for motherboards and processors, that would impact everyone in the mainstream. The ones who need all those lanes can pay for it themselves - in other words, If you really need that many PCIe lanes, you need to get a HEDT platform.
It isn't going to happen on mainstream platforms, very few normal people need more than one full-speed NVMe SSD (for most of the mainstream, I suspect most computers have only one HDD or SSD) and motherboards don't really have space for more than three NVMes either unless you put them on PCIe riser cards. On cards, you could have a PLX PCIe router to split a PCIe 4.0x4 slot between however many NVMes you can fit on the card or have up to four NVMes wired as 4.0x1 instead of using a $50+ chip.Yeah but if folks want 6+ M.2 slots (like they have 6 or so SATA now) how's it gonna happen?
It isn't going to happen on mainstream platforms, very few normal people need more than one full-speed NVMe SSD (for most of the mainstream, I suspect most computers have only one HDD or SSD) and motherboards don't really have space for more than three NVMes either unless you put them on PCIe riser cards. On cards, you could have a PLX PCIe router to split a PCIe 4.0x4 slot between however many NVMes you can fit on the card or have up to four NVMes wired as 4.0x1 instead of using a $50+ chip.
Never happened. In July of 2004, I paid Newegg $169 for an ASUS P4C800-E DELUXE motherboard. Incidentally, that was the only motherboard that ever died on me.As for price hikes I remember when a high end motherboard cost $60. It wasn't all that long ago.
...er, welcome to reality?Welcome to the new world.
Never happened. In July of 2004, I paid Newegg $169 for an ASUS P4C800-E DELUXE motherboard. Incidentally, that was the only motherboard that ever died on me.
Anyway, whatever you're remembering, that wasn't a high-end motherboard, by any definition.
...er, welcome to reality?
You said:2004 eh? That's nice. I'm talking 10 years before that...
I remember when a high end motherboard cost $60. It wasn't all that long ago.
Makes no difference for normal applications, you'd need PSUs designed to take external DC power to bypass the input stage and even if you bypassed the high voltage regulator, you'd still need a buck-boost DC-DC converter to regulate battery's 10V empty under load to 14.5V end-of-charge to 12V+/-5% and you get ~10% losses there. Also, for significant loads, you'd want a 24V storage system so you only need a simple efficient buck converter over the entire battery voltage range instead of a more complex and less efficient buck-boost one.Won't this have major implications for UPS designs?