Dat chart...
/START RANT
2060 Super is even closer to 2070-like performance, which doesn't measure up to anything, since the original 2060 was already in the SINGLE DIGITS relative of that card's performance.
At least it has better value than the 2070, right? Not when it was already expensive for a mid-range card to begin with, it's not.
Same deal with the other Super models, it seems. Yeah, that's right. Super doesn't quite measure up (it's close though!) to the performance of the card it's replacing, but it comes at an overall 10-15% better value, but even that value gets pegged down a notch when you consider that they're already pricey.
Three ways to look at this. From a performance only perspective, it's 'meh'. Value is... 'okay?'. Put those 2 together, and it's...
"Why even bother with this launch?"
Oh right, the upcoming Navi cards which were already looking to be inferior to Turing, but will likely be a threat to Nvidia's mid-range only due to pricing. *I say this, because for a while now, Nvidia has made the superior product in performance and power consumption. All AMD has in this field so far is pricing. Performance isn't as good, when comparing the same tiers, and while having higher power use, which depending on where you live, could make for a noticeably higher power bill.
There was no need for this Super launch - they don't really offer anything over the cards they're replacing! All the stubborn pricks(Nvidia) had to do was LOWER THEIR PRICES on the existing cards, but NOOOOOOOO...
I'm skipping this gen. As much as I want to see a 2080Ti Super, I can't expect much from it after the sour taste in my mouth that is the other Super cards.
/END RANT
That said, the 2060 Super is looking to be the new price/performance leader among the 20 series.