News Russia develops its first lithography tool — outdated by 30 years from day one

"We assembled and made the first domestic lithographic scanner,"
Found a picture of it...

71JdLrB8QML._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg
 
not bad for a country with 1/13th GPD of USA, still too old node to be useful. 350nm is the node Pentium -Pentium II was made.
I think is more like a proof of concept and to training engineers, for everything else they'll have to buy the chinese offerings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyrusfox
not bad for a country with 1/13th GPD of USA, still too old node to be useful. 350nm is the node Pentium -Pentium II was made.
I think is more like a proof of concept and to training engineers, for everything else they'll have to buy the chinese offerings.
Well better late than never I guess. I believe they can manufacture 250nm using multi patterning or even a half node beyond (220nm) with quad patterning. Heck, if SMIC shares their etching technique that allows them to make 5nm class features, perhaps Russia can eke out a 180nm process. It’ll be interesting to see what they can do bringing modern techniques to old lithography technology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ivan_vy
The world of semiconductors is broader than smartphone SoCs and data center GPUs; there is a heap of silicon in current production that uses 180nm+ lithography. I suspect Russia's priorities lie in beefing up homegrown capabilities for national security related concerns first and foremost, competing with ASML probably isn't too high on that list. They already have domestic production capability for 65nm chips, though clearly not using domestic tools.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: shady28
350nm is small enough for most applications and is used in far more products than most tech savvy people probably realize. Shrinking a process node (or a dozen process nodes) has no impact on the performance on most of the chips made with these nodes. Your microwave won't heat your food faster using a 7nm controller compared to a 600nm controller. Virtually anything in your house that plugs into the wall or uses batteries has some sort of chip inside and rarely does the lithography generation make any difference of its functionality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PEnns
Commendable effort, on their way to establish independent capability, bleeding edge is not needed for majority of use cases for microelectronics.

Its too bad that ASML is the only horse in the race at the bleeding edge, The improvements from here for ASML are very slow, So there is time for newcomers to come in and iterate to be a cost competitive solution as well as pick up the rest of the market. Litho is expensive, competition is welcome.
 
I wonder how many of you are impressed by this "publicly-funded" effort to create it's first tooling as much as I am?

There were PRACTICAL lessons learned around the processes of building tooling like this that needed to be DISCOVERED and DEVELOPED for the first time.

Could they have shot for a smaller process node? I suppose, maybe.

But I think, whether they had a choice or not, it is beneficial to start with something "easier" just so you can focus on the steps needed to get from a thought to a real product.

All that has been figured out now.

Now it's just a matter of refining those steps, and they will.

Hats off to a country for learning!
 
The world of semiconductors is broader than smartphone SoCs and data center GPUs; there is a heap of silicon in current production that uses 180nm+ lithography. I suspect Russia's priorities lie in beefing up homegrown capabilities for national security related concerns first and foremost, competing with ASML probably isn't too high on that list. They already have domestic production capability for 65nm chips, though clearly not using domestic tools.

Exactly. UMC, Taiwan's 2nd largest semi maker and the one that makes critical automotive chips, only has one fab out of 11 that can do 28 / 14 nm. Most of the rest are 150nm or larger. Those are what run cars, trucks, smart AC systems, etc.

I'd bet they'll have 250nm within a year or so. That's P3 and the old DEC Alpha node.

In reality, what this does is give them the ability to make those supporting chips for relatively mundane tasks domestically, while heavier hitting SoCs and CPUs can be made in China on SMICs 14-28nm nodes.
 
How many countries can produce their own chips? 5? 10? How many of them do have lithography?.. so, not too bad to have even 30 years old technologies here. They will improve it pretty quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shady28 and ivan_vy
not bad for a country with 1/13th GPD of USA, still too old node to be useful. 350nm is the node Pentium -Pentium II was made.
I think is more like a proof of concept and to training engineers, for everything else they'll have to buy the chinese offerings.
Russia has significant expertese in plasma physics, the crux of EUV. I exp
 
  • Like
Reactions: serget