It is faster. No doubt. But not by 10%. But by a meager 6%. Thats all.
Huh? That's only the 7zip benchmark (also, the delta is 6.8% because you're looking at the reciprocal rather than the complement). That ignores power-scaling on Cinebench and it ignores the Blender results.
The Cinebench results are pretty shocking, because I mean who really wants a laptop using 100 W or even 80 W? I have a "mobile workstation"-class laptop for my job, and I turn down the power settings even when it's plugged in. The fans are too obnoxious, otherwise.
BTW, those Blender results are sorted in the wrong order. It's measuring time, so the fastest CPU has the shortest time. If you look at the reported times, the 7945HX is 7.5% faster than the i9-13950HX.
With all that being said, the main thing to keep in mind is that laptops vary a lot in power parameters and cooling efficiency. So, we would ideally compare the performance several implementations of each CPU. It's error-prone to read too much into the performance measured from a single unit.