g-unit1111 :
Don't get me wrong, I like the design of this tablet. I have a Galaxy S6 and it's amazing phone. And I like to see the design of this thing carry over to the tablets. But if tablets are being used for movies and TV viewing, why does the 4:3 aspect stay? Why can't tablet manufacturers embrace the widescreen format? Just about every phone on the market uses 16:9, and HTC manages to make 16:9 work on the Nexus 9, and Microsoft does it well on Surface devices.
Ahem.
You do know that the Nexus 9 is 4:3, and the Surface 3 and Surface 3 Pro are 3:2?
Also, you're approaching this from the wrong end. This isn't a case of the 4:3 aspect ratio "staying" - even though Apple have always been the market leader for tablets, they are only one maker.
All other mainstream tablets in the west have been 16:9 or 16:10. What we are seeing now is mainstream tablets moving
away from widescreen aspect ratios. And this is exactly because the use cases that you name are
not dominant. Sure, people watch Netflix on their tablets now and then. But the
vast majority of time is spent reding, browsing and other non-widescreen reliant use.
Phones are another case entirely - they need to be slim enough to fit in your hand, while still maximizing display area. At the same time, being too tall makes them hard to handle. The 16:9 aspect ratio seems to hit a sweet spot here. These arguments are not valid for tablets, however. I would
love for my phone to be wider, as it would make it infinitely better for web browsing and reading. It would, however, also make it nearly impossible to hold - defeating its purpose entirely.
Tablets became victims of the sad and destructive and silly fad that laptops have been dominated by for the last decade or more, with displays suited almost exclusively for film/TV consumption. Have you ever tried to work on a large text document on a small-ish (~13") 16:9 or 16:10 display? It's a pretty terrible experience, and results in loads of wasted screen real estate. The same goes for web browsing -
all web pages are vertically oriented, which makes zero sense on an overly horizontally oriented display. Viewing Tom's hardware on my ThinkPad X201 - which is 16:10, not 16:9 - results in pretty much half the screen being wasted. My main monitor is 16:9, but that's only acceptable as it's 27". Any smaller, and its vertical size would have been far too small.