Samsung's Series 9 13.3" Ultrabook For 2012: Thinner And Lighter

Status
Not open for further replies.

mayankleoboy1

Distinguished
Aug 11, 2010
2,497
0
19,810
18
Is the QS balance between quality/speed determined by any OEM customised driver ?

Because this samsung notebook takes more time than other i7's in 'quality' setting, but lesser time in 'performance' settings.
 

joytech22

Distinguished
Jun 4, 2008
1,685
0
19,810
10
[citation][nom]esrever[/nom]Don't samsung ultra books overheat a lot?[/citation]
What..? No. That's the dell's and I'm not even joking.

I was watching a demo and their Dell XPS ultrabooks with GT640's in them continuously overheated during the demos and lowered the FPS catastrophically low.

They have these ultrabooks at my local Jb HiFi (Well.. the i5 version at least) and it was cool to the touch and very solid (I've noticed even Acer's ultrabooks don't feel flimsy as sh*t like their notebooks).
 

Yargnit

Distinguished
Aug 17, 2010
260
0
18,810
10
Looks awesome, but unfortunately the 'ASUS Zenbook Prime UX31A' simply trounces it on a price/performance ratio. If there was a base model out for under $1200, preferably at $1000 like the Asus it'd be a very solid option. But the Asus for $1000 is just such a better value that it kind of make this look like a weak effort, which is too bad because it actually looks like a solid system.
 

ojas

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2011
2,924
0
20,810
15
Hmmm...interesting, one of the most positive review's i've seen of an ultrabook-class notebook...i just have two questions:

1)Is the touchpad annoying? Compared to Apple's touchpads, for example.
2)Can you keep it in your lap, sitting or lying down slightly (you know, with the notebook against your knees)? Or does it get too warm?

These two are deal breakers for me, personally. So is the keyboard, but you've clearly stated what's wrong with that (touchpad too, but just wanted to know if it's a noticeable annoyance).
 

veroxious

Distinguished
Oct 15, 2009
13
0
18,510
0
BTW why was the Asus UX31A not used in the comparative benchmarks? We have the same form factor, Ivy Bridge i7 processor, 256GB SSD BUT the Asus sports a Full HD IPS panel that really impressed me for less money.
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
[citation][nom]mayankleoboy1[/nom]in the screen quality/brightness benchmark, why u no compare with the new rMBP ?[/citation]
I haven't gone out to buy one yet :)
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
[citation][nom]ojas[/nom]Yo Tom's, why you no review Lenovo's Carbon X?[/citation]
I have it here in the lab, and it'll be the next Ultrabook we look at (I have something special planned for it ;-)
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
[citation][nom]ojas[/nom]Hmmm...interesting, one of the most positive review's i've seen of an ultrabook-class notebook...i just have two questions:1)Is the touchpad annoying? Compared to Apple's touchpads, for example.2)Can you keep it in your lap, sitting or lying down slightly (you know, with the notebook against your knees)? Or does it get too warm?These two are deal breakers for me, personally. So is the keyboard, but you've clearly stated what's wrong with that (touchpad too, but just wanted to know if it's a noticeable annoyance).[/citation]
I can't speak to the Samsung, but on the X1, the touchpad (which everyone seems to rave about) is sooo not good compared to the MBA's. It does not get too warm, though. Again, this is specific to the X1.
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
[citation][nom]veroxious[/nom]BTW why was the Asus UX31A not used in the comparative benchmarks? We have the same form factor, Ivy Bridge i7 processor, 256GB SSD BUT the Asus sports a Full HD IPS panel that really impressed me for less money.[/citation]
I haven't gone out to buy one of those, either :)
 

cangelini

Contributing Editor
Editor
Jul 4, 2008
1,878
9
19,795
4
[citation][nom]techcurious[/nom]Andrew, on the third page in the PCMARK 7 table of scores, you say that the Samsung wins every sub category. And I believe bold font is normally used to highlight the best score in each test. However, the numbers themselves tell a different tale.Video Playback and Transcoding-Downscaling: 26.61853 MB/s vs 43.79059 MB/s (Lenovo Wins)andImage Manipulation: 9.51 Mpx/s vs 9.56 Mpx/s (Lenovo Wins again).[/citation]
Usually, that's the case. I think Andrew highlighted all one column to indicate it's the Samsung. I just went back and made sure that the *winning* numbers are in bold!
 

techcurious

Distinguished
Jul 14, 2009
228
0
18,680
0
It was about 3 months ago when I had the pleasure of acquiring this same ultrabook with these same exact specs for a client. I have to admit I was surprised and disappointed to find that Samsung didn't use their own SSD in it. But I was blown away by the 12 second boot up time (all the way to desktop)! And this was after I loaded it with antivirus and MS Office and many other programs! (On my desktop, my SSD has to wait for about 15 seconds of BIOS POST). Oddly enough though, within the first 24 hours of use while I was still setting it up for my client and removing the recovery partition, the SSD simply failed. So, I went back to the store and swapped it out for another (the ultrabook, not the SSD). New one has been working flawlessly since.
I did not find the "right click" confusing at all. It's not that hard to keep in mind that to activate the right click I need to move to the lower end of the touchpad. All you need to do is dedicate 2 minutes to test, practice and familiarize yourself with the boundaries of the touchpad. I love Macbook touchpads, and this is the closest any Windows PC touchpad has ever come as far as I have tried. I loved it.
@ ojas.. No, it never got too warm while I used it for 48 hours. However, I did not use it to encode videos nor did I do something silly like play "Battlefield 3" on it. So I can't say it will remain cool while doing that. But during regular use (including many software installations), it stayed cool!
This is my favorite Ultrabook and my only recommendation to clients and friends.
Oh, and it really does feel incredibly light and it has a very high quality premium feel overall, justifying the price tag.
 
G

Guest

Guest
this is purely out of curiosity, appreciate it if someone can fill me in. why would samsung be using a lite-on ssd instead of one of their own? especially considering samsung ssds are not too shabby at all.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Where's my 16:10 display? Why is this so fucking impossible when MBP's have it?
 

mayankleoboy1

Distinguished
Aug 11, 2010
2,497
0
19,810
18
[citation][nom]cangelini[/nom]I haven't gone out to buy one yet[/citation]

i thought Apple would have sent a review sample to you. A positive review from Toms is a big thing...
 
Well a few things, first the Samsung has a horrible keyboard, the SSD (mSATA) is slow, everything requires a dongle, WiFi dropouts, and mixed bag performance so you have to question why some of these common issues are lacking in this article. I've tried one. Comparisons - You're comparing performance to an iPad?! What about the MacBook Air/Pro (MBA/MBP)?? Why not compare NB's with the same CPU and similar specs - none of this made any sense to me. Examples: Geekbench and SSD

My office I use an HP EliteBook Mobile Workstation and some of us use others including ASUS, but for home, travel or even work it's still tough to ignore the MBA or MBP which is one of Samsung's major competitors in this category. None of these notebooks are really any good for gaming.

Now if all you're doing is smurfing the web, checking your email, Facebook, documents, and a slew of other typical tasks then any of the notebooks or tablets are 'good enough.'
 
Sep 21, 2010
375
0
18,790
1
[citation][nom]nxdnk[/nom]Where's my 16:10 display? Why is this so fucking impossible when MBP's have it?[/citation]
Normally, I'd agree with you...but my two exceptions are 1600x900 (why wouldn't you take that over 1440x900) and 1920x1080 as a replacement for 1680x1050 (though it's bull$#!+ that manufacturers are using it in place of 1920x1200).
 

ojas

Distinguished
Feb 25, 2011
2,924
0
20,810
15
[citation][nom]cangelini[/nom]I have it here in the lab, and it'll be the next Ultrabook we look at (I have something special planned for it ;-)[/citation]
Yesssssss! :D

[citation][nom]cangelini[/nom]I can't speak to the Samsung, but on the X1, the touchpad (which everyone seems to rave about) is sooo not good compared to the MBA's. It does not get too warm, though. Again, this is specific to the X1.[/citation]
Surprising, especially after the rave reviews (read a few)...but i wanted to read tom's review to be sure ;)
Shame really, tbh...

[citation][nom]techcurious[/nom]@ ojas.. No, it never got too warm while I used it for 48 hours. However, I did not use it to encode videos nor did I do something silly like play "Battlefield 3" on it. So I can't say it will remain cool while doing that. But during regular use (including many software installations), it stayed cool!This is my favorite Ultrabook and my only recommendation to clients and friends.Oh, and it really does feel incredibly light and it has a very high quality premium feel overall, justifying the price tag.[/citation]
Thanks for filling me in. Yeah i meant for normal non-gaming tasks...i'm not going to buy an ultrabook to game, i have my desktop for that :D
Heat and the keyboard and touchpad have been the biggest complaints of all the ultrabooks i've reviewed...
 

SuperVeloce

Distinguished
Aug 20, 2011
154
0
18,690
1
[citation][nom]Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer[/nom]Normally, I'd agree with you...but my two exceptions are 1600x900 (why wouldn't you take that over 1440x900) and 1920x1080 as a replacement for 1680x1050 (though it's bull$#!+ that manufacturers are using it in place of 1920x1200).[/citation]
exactly because of your closing statement. 1920x1080 is more of a replacement for 1920x1200 rather than 1680x1050
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY