They say SSD drives with SATA are slower than M.2 drives. When I searched for information on the M.2 drive, it said it transferred a maximum of 3 GB/s. Because of this, and the notion that SATA is slower, I came to the conclusion that SATA Gb/s were slower, and different.
P.S. I am just trying to learn more about this subject. Sorry that the question was unclear, but I would never learn if I didn't ask questions.
There is nothing wrong with asking questions. Ever.
But, when you ask, you need to be sure to make it VERY CLEAR what it is you are asking, not just a couple of vague words, so that somebody will have no trouble knowing what the question actually IS. If that means you need to write three or four sentences to spell out exactly what you want to know, then do that.
As USAFRet has already indicated, M.2 has nothing to do with the speed. M.2 is ONLY the "shape/form factor" of the drive and how it plugs in. It is nothing whatsoever to do with speed.
The speed is determined by whether it is an SATA, PCIe or NVME device. PCIe and NVME devices are SOMETIMES much faster than a SATA device, but not always. In some cases, for most normal use scenarios like random reads and writes, it is no faster than a SATA drive. Other times, for sequential reads and writes, especially when it's a single large file, it is much faster.
And to answer your question there ISN'T any "SATA vs Normal" speed comparison that is black and white, because it will be totally different speeds based on the specific drive being used, WHAT is being read or written, what the speed of BOTH devices are and even where those devices are connected to on the motherboard or in some cases, via an external USB connection.