Eh? So what if Al Gore uses green issues to try and get "hip with the kids". That doesn't mean that global warming doesn't exist.
In this particular issue, total impirical evidence will only be submitted when the Earth is a burnt cinder and anyone left (probably in underground caverns or in spaceships) say, "So, that pretty much proves Global Warming". If you are going to try and debunk Global Warming why didn't you do a proper job and post a few links to studies that prove it doesn't exist, for every one you do there will someone else who says it does.
Considering what is at stake, what is the better viewpoint to take?
#1 - Fuck it, lets just keep burning shit, there's no real proof.
#2 - If there's and ground to this we could all be in deep shit, let's stop burning stuff.
I think we all know which of the 2 camps you you have parked yourself in. Why don't you get behind the crew that want to try and save the world, or is it a case of "fuck it, i'll be long dead before this takes effect".