News SCSI isn't dead yet — new SSD for old or obsolete systems is a boon for retro computing fans

Status
Not open for further replies.
However, SSDL’s Sales & Marketing Director, James Hilken, points out that there are still systems used in aerospace, defense, manufacturing, medical, telecommunications, and other sectors “that were designed decades ago and were fitted with then state-of-the-art SCSI hard disk drives.” .”

Just like that air gapped train we saw a little while back.

Is odd they chose to add CF capability though since an M.2 is far cheaper.
 

bit_user

Titan
Ambassador
I wonder if the low latency or high-throughput of a SSD could expose some bugs in software for these ancient machines. Basically, race conditions where the commands complete sooner than they used to, and therefore catch the software in a bad state. If so, it'd be funny if they had to fit these adapters with "turbo buttons" to artificially slow them down, like old PCs used to have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snemarch

Vanderlindemedia

Commendable
Jul 15, 2022
128
72
1,660
I wonder if the low latency or high-throughput of a SSD could expose some bugs in software for these ancient machines. Basically, race conditions where the commands complete sooner than they used to, and therefore catch the software in a bad state. If so, it'd be funny if they had to fit these adapters with "turbo buttons" to artificially slow them down, like old PCs used to have.

No, they would not.

There's no such thing as a timer that was needed with programs that would not use the inbuild crystal and simply relied on CPU clockspeed.

SCSI was mainly enterprise oriented - compared to ATA for consumers it offered far better options, and more reliable too. But as disks age, and likely die after years of use, getting the parts would be more difficult and expensive over time.

SSD is no holy grail too - written bytes will affect those SSD's. I'm sure with maxed out read/write speeds it could actually be beneficial for very old servers. No latency in seeking anymore. Fire it up!
 

Justin Goldberg

Distinguished
Aug 4, 2014
20
6
18,515
No, they would not.

There's no such thing as a timer that was needed with programs that would not use the inbuild crystal and simply relied on CPU clockspeed.

SCSI was mainly enterprise oriented - compared to ATA for consumers it offered far better options, and more reliable too. But as disks age, and likely die after years of use, getting the parts would be more difficult and expensive over time.

SSD is no holy grail too - written bytes will affect those SSD's. I'm sure with maxed out read/write speeds it could actually be beneficial for very old servers. No latency in seeking anymore. Fire it up!

interesting. I heard from someone that when ssd drives first came out, that many disk controllers/bios needed updates because ssds used all of the ATA or scsi commands that were not used on older technology disks. But I'm not sure if they were referring to ide or SATA drives.

Also one problem with this device is that it appears that the SSD inside is not removable, although I'm sure it can be removed.

Fun fact, ide raid cards do exist.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bit_user

bit_user

Titan
Ambassador
Fun fact, ide raid cards do exist.
About 20 years ago, a friend of mine worked for a startup that lost the RAID on one of their main servers, due to a bug in a 3Ware IDE RAID card.

Around the same time, I setup a server for the startup I worked at, but I avoided RAID. I wanted the simplest, most commodity setup possible, in hopes that it was the best-tested and most reliable (Linux wasn't nearly as popular, back then). So, our little source control server just had a single IDE drive and I did backups to a CD-R drive. I last saw that machine still running in a dark corner of a machine room, about 5 years ago.
 

USAFRet

Titan
Moderator
About 20 years ago, a friend of mine worked for a startup that lost the RAID on one of their main servers, due to a bug in a 3Ware IDE RAID card.

Around the same time, I setup a server for the startup I worked at, but I avoided RAID. I wanted the simplest, most commodity setup possible, in hopes that it was the best-tested and most reliable (Linux wasn't nearly as popular, back then). So, our little source control server just had a single IDE drive and I did backups to a CD-R drive. I last saw that machine still running in a dark corner of a machine room, about 5 years ago.
Meanwhile, we have home users with 4x NVMe drives in RAID 0 for their game volume.

And then cry when things go sideways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bit_user
Status
Not open for further replies.