Selecting a monitor

not sure. i have a large desk. looking for value! since im only getting one now prefer on the larger size, 23"+. whats best for money now? want colors on monitor to match photos and make games look awesome
 
If you want colors to match photos, that probably means you want an IPS or PVA monitor, though those can sometimes have issues with response time and input lag. In your price range, I found two monitors on NewEgg that you could investigate further:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=24-001-463 (I'm a little suspicious of the claim of 4000:1 static contrast ratio, but it could still be a good monitor at the more common 1000:1 static contrast ratio)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824002536
I also found one that's a bit above your price range, but might still be worth investigating:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=24-002-524
Unfortunately, I couldn't find professional reviews of any of those 3 monitors.
 


You are not going to get a monitor with good color accuracy with your budget.

The best suggestion I can make is the 21.5" Dell U2211h currently on sale for $230:
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&cs=19&sku=320-9271&baynote_bnrank=1&baynote_irrank=0&~ck=baynoteSearch

If color accuracy is not important then the Asus you selected should be fine.
 
Ok, maybe I'm missing something. Why does it cost so much to have an accurate color representation? Are you guys saying if I tune it so one color looks right, the rest won't? I'm surprised it's that difficult to get accurate color representation. I guess if I had to choose, I'll probably care more about gaming then the colors, as I can always print more pictures if I don't like the way one turns out... Based on that... was one of the above better for gaming?
 
It has to do with the panel technology itself and the manufacturing process and cost behind it.

TN panels are cheap to manufacture and have fast response times. They have narrow viewing angles which causes color to shift easily. This is basically due to how the pixels in a TN panel operate which is beyond the scope of this reply. They use 6-bit color technology for each primary color to reduce cost. Doing some simply binary math, 6-bit = 2^6 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 64. That means for each primary color (Red, Green & Blue) has 64 shades to make a total of 256k colors. That's 64^3 = 64 x 64 x 64 = 256k. Using a process called temporal dithering (flashing between 2 colors to make a 3rd color) the remaining 16 million color are created. Since these are "artificial colors" they are not precise, but good enough for the average person.

More expensive technologies like VA and IPS are true 8-bit color LCD panels which can truly create 16.7m colors. It requires more materials which also means increased manufacturing time which leads to increased costs. Again, doing some simple binary math 8-bit color = 2^8 = 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 256. That's 256 shades of each primary color (Red, Green, Blue) to create the entire rainbow of colors. This translates to 256^3 = 256 x 256 x 256 = 16.7m colors. The way these type of panel technologies operate is behind the reason why colors shift less than TN panels and why they have wider viewing angles.

The monitor I recommended was the Dell U2211h which uses the newer e-IPS panel. It is pretty inexpensive compared to other IPS panels. Basically it is a blend of IPS and TN panels to look at it another way. I stated above that all IPS panel used 8-bit color. However, e-IPS is the exception for most the different models. e-IPS is a 6-bit IPS panel to cut down on cost and make it competitive against more expensive TN panels.

Accurate color representation is much, much more complex than you think and also much more expensive. For those people who really need highly accurate colors they go for the high end monitors and high end printers and don't forget the softwares used to calibrate them. When I say high end I mean $3,000 - $6,000 for NEC or Eizo monitors and $3,000+ for thermal wax color printers.
 


The Asus monitor you selected seems fine.

I know for a fact that the Asus VK246H and VW246H is good for gaming. Color accuracy? Well that's a different story, but I think my idea of color accuracy is more stringent than yours.

I own the 24" Asus VK246H and it is basically the same as the VW246H but with the addition of a built-in webcam. You can buy the Asus VW246H for $190 which includes includes free shipping.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236049&Tpk=asus%20vw246h

How does it compare to the 23" ASUS VH236H? I don't know. But they were released around the same time.

Here's my review:

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/58336-3-official-flat-panel-monitor-reviews-thread


Here's a professional review of the Asus VK246H published around 5 months after my review:

http://www.prad.de/en/monitore/review/2009/review-asus-vk246h.html#Introduction