PsychoTeddy provided excellent information and cited numerous sources in his replies. This is the type of information that should be HIGHLIGHTED and presented to all persons considering online financial transactions.
I would go a step further in the PayPal scenario and submit for consideration that PayPal probably has a Fraud Investigation division and may themselves be the ones posting information on various chatrooms and IRC channels in an attempt to "reverse phish" the Con-artists, scammer and trolls into using information they believe is legitimate. The problem with crime (generally speaking) is that there are EVEN LESS guarantees on your success than with legitimate online transactions. At least with the legitimate online transactions conducted within the framework the provider (such as PayPal) has created, they will PROBABLY stand by their system and honor misdirected payments and compromised information.
In the case of information being voluntarily compromised, well, the exploitation of the weakest link in the chain is something NOBODY can do anything about! If a person was willing to provide their personal account information to a website that only "appeared" to be legitimate BUT which they did not attempt to verify or confirm, then they were "the weakest link" and should be responsibile for their own stupidity.
Personally I hope that anyone using account numbers they obtained from a chatroom is CAUGHT and prosecuted to the full extent of the law in BOTH countries where the transaction was processed! What could be worse than being convicted of a crime in India and also having the privilege of travelling to the United States ten years later stripped away? Committing a felony and having a criminal record on your resume is NOT something employers want.
Are legitimate business transactions in India done "on terms" (such as '90 Days Same As Cash') so that companies may invoice each other and pay by certified check -- or official company check, a short time later? Admittedly I know almost nothing about international business, but I believe there are higher level (i.e. "legitimate") business practices used when buying and selling hard goods (such as electronics) in large quantities. If a non-U.S. company is unwilling to consider adopting the same type of business practices used to conduct legitimate business elsewhere, then I say, "Its their loss. Somebody else will buy the stuff."
~