Sempron 140 Gets Second Core Unlocked

Status
Not open for further replies.

hellwig

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
1,743
0
19,860
As with anything, don't count on this working with your sempron.

However, according to the site, they used a 790GX with ACC. I would think you could get a cheaper motherboard, and buy a Athlon X2 you know will work properly with both cores enabled. Seriously, who's going to spend money on a 790GX but buy a $40 Sempron and hope they can get both cores working?
 

ahslan

Distinguished
Aug 23, 2007
941
0
18,990
^that is true...if you could do this with a cheap board, that would be awesome...not sure if cheap boards have this feature...
 

mtyermom

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2007
956
0
18,980
Like Hellwig said, it's nice as a proof of concept, but for the same money you can get guaranteed and reliable dual core performance for the same money.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Reliable? Wouldn't be surprised if some of the Sempron's were binned out because of a defective core...even a core that might "mostly work", but fail some more obscure test case. I wouldn't use this on a PC where reliability is a consideration.
 
[citation][nom]hellwig[/nom]As with anything, don't count on this working with your sempron.However, according to the site, they used a 790GX with ACC. I would think you could get a cheaper motherboard, and buy a Athlon X2 you know will work properly with both cores enabled. Seriously, who's going to spend money on a 790GX but buy a $40 Sempron and hope they can get both cores working?[/citation]
Agreed. It does seem a bit pointless to spend all that money on a board and then just drop a $40 CPU to it. However, if it's just for the experience (and bragging rights) then this makes sense.
 

raabscuttle

Distinguished
Apr 24, 2009
27
0
18,530
[citation][nom]bob1942[/nom]Reliable? Wouldn't be surprised if some of the Sempron's were binned out because of a defective core...even a core that might "mostly work", but fail some more obscure test case. I wouldn't use this on a PC where reliability is a consideration.[/citation]
Yup, there's a reason that this got dumpped to being a "Sempron" rather than a Athlon II - these are usually the silicon that had unstability or "other issues". Sure you can do it, but exactly how reliable would that hyped up Sempron be?
 
G

Guest

Guest
You can't say it's unreliable until you've actually tried it, obviously you wouldn't want to run something mission critical with it, but why not give it a try, if it crashes, just turn it off? You might wind up with a decent dual-core machine on the cheap, if not, as long as the Sempron can serve your needs, there is no problem.
 

JackNSally

Distinguished
Jun 16, 2009
25
0
18,530
If they are disabling the other core to meet demand then your chances are pretty high of unlocking the extra core. Now, if they are doing it to dump faulty chips then your chances are pretty low.
 

mtyermom

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2007
956
0
18,980
[citation][nom]JackNSally[/nom]If they are disabling the other core to meet demand then your chances are pretty high of unlocking the extra core. Now, if they are doing it to dump faulty chips then your chances are pretty low.[/citation]

I would imagine it's a combination of the two, depending on the yields at any given time.
 

Prescott_666

Distinguished
May 13, 2009
166
0
18,690
I want to upgrade my system. Currently my main system is a Dell Precision 370 with a Pentium 4 530 3.0 MHz with Windows XP Pro. but I have an older system that I can reuse the case, floppy, DVD-RW and 300W PSU and I have a WDCWD3200AAJS SATA hard drive that I can use. I need a motherboard and processor and if I get an AM3 motherboard, DDR3 memory. Stuff like a new case, a better power supply, and more memory I can get one piece at a time

I'm thinking of getting an AM3 785G or 790GX motherboard. If I get something like a Phenom 955 processor, that's pretty much it forever. I'm not going to pull and throw away a $200 processor. So when the 32mn processors come out next year, I'll look at them and read the specs, but I won't get one.

But if I get the $40 Sempron, that's a different story. Then I can get a 32nm AM3 Phenom (Phenom III?) for a couple hundred bucks and throw the Sempron away.
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,078
0
20,810
[citation][nom]hellwig[/nom]As with anything, don't count on this working with your sempron.However, according to the site, they used a 790GX with ACC. I would think you could get a cheaper motherboard, and buy a Athlon X2 you know will work properly with both cores enabled. Seriously, who's going to spend money on a 790GX but buy a $40 Sempron and hope they can get both cores working?[/citation]
I get your point, but I bought one of those boards (msi) in april or may along with a cheap athlon 5050e - I don't remember what that processor was offered for, but I know it wasn't by any means the most expensive one.
 

amnotanoobie

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2006
1,493
0
19,360
[citation][nom]neiroatopelcc[/nom]I get your point, but I bought one of those boards (msi) in april or may along with a cheap athlon 5050e - I don't remember what that processor was offered for, but I know it wasn't by any means the most expensive one.[/citation]

But buying a Sempron and unlocking a core would be a $40 gamble for your case. If you have extra $40 that you could spare, then you're welcome to try, though you need to make sure that the other disabled core was disabled due to demand rather than being faulty.
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,078
0
20,810
[citation][nom]amnotanoobie[/nom]But buying a Sempron and unlocking a core would be a $40 gamble for your case. If you have extra $40 that you could spare, then you're welcome to try, though you need to make sure that the other disabled core was disabled due to demand rather than being faulty.[/citation]
I've yet to hear about anyone breaking the cpu by trying to unlock a core. Worst case scenario, it doesn't work and you have to reset the bios and just live with hte performance you bought in the first place.
 

Prescott_666

Distinguished
May 13, 2009
166
0
18,690
Which 790GX motherboards have ACC and have successfully unlocked the second core? ASRock M3A790GXH/128M AM3; MSI 790GX-G65 AM3; GIGABYTE GA-MA790GPT-UD3H AM3; DFI LP JR 790GX-M3H5 AM3; ASUS M4A78T-E AM3; or others?
 

amnotanoobie

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2006
1,493
0
19,360
[citation][nom]neiroatopelcc[/nom]I've yet to hear about anyone breaking the cpu by trying to unlock a core. Worst case scenario, it doesn't work and you have to reset the bios and just live with hte performance you bought in the first place.[/citation]

It was highlighted on the core unlocking article by Tom's. How do you validate that the core does fully work?

It's not about breaking the cpu (which is near impossible for unlocking a core), but it's a gamble for the person. It might be a $40 well-spent or a $40 waste for the other guy (since he already has a better cpu).
 

neiroatopelcc

Distinguished
Oct 3, 2006
3,078
0
20,810
[citation][nom]amnotanoobie[/nom]It was highlighted on the core unlocking article by Tom's. How do you validate that the core does fully work? It's not about breaking the cpu (which is near impossible for unlocking a core), but it's a gamble for the person. It might be a $40 well-spent or a $40 waste for the other guy (since he already has a better cpu).[/citation]
I read that article. But basicly the problem is no different than overclocking. How do you know it's stable? Just because it can run prime without the icon going from red to yellow doesn't prove it. You just have to assume that if it looks like a horse, it probably is one.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Already had an Asrock AOD790GX/128H on the bench, so installed a 140 and it appears to be straight forward. Just enable the ACC to All Cores and you get two cores. Seems to show 3D Mark 06 and PC Mark 05 scores similar to the 7750BE (that's the closest cpu I have to compare it with) at 2.7GHz and 3.1GHz, all other components being equal. The least expensive Asrock motherboard with ACC seems to be the A780GMH128M at around 65% of the AOD790GX/128H. Still, I get more out of a E5200+G31 board for less money, but it worth checking the result anyway.
 

viometrix

Distinguished
Jun 24, 2009
482
0
18,860
you know the only thing in this article that had any impact to me, and lately most of the articles on toms hardware as of late- the vast amount of typos. if you guys are a technology site and cant use a technology like spellcheck and proof reading, then how can we trust you know what you are talking about?

so you may be able to post information i can get on other sites, but your credibility lacks due to such common and frequent mistakes making your writers and editors look like monkeys at they keyboard typing for bananas.

oh and unlocking the unstable core is both pointless and a waste of money. its already been done, and the reason the core is locked is because it failed initial tests and was downgraded to a sempron.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.