should i be happy and just run with it

gingerbee

Distinguished
Jun 18, 2008
66
0
18,630
e7200@3.8 at 1.31v on water temps are fine i am on a p5q that can handle 1600 fsb which i am at 400*9.5=3.8
problem when ever i try to go above 420 fsb it becomes unstable.

spec: cpu-3.8@1.31v
nb on auto
sb on auto
vtt auto
ram 1066 adata 1.9v

i am willing to go more but everthing was just so easy to get to 3.8 i was like wow and just got stuck there i have gotten it up to 4.0 but i was not sure if i was doin it right because the only thing that made it stable was 1.42v which i think is to high not really sure with the 45nm chips. So i have played with the nb, vtt and even the ram v up to 2.2 to try and get it stable but no luck only thing that seems to work is high vcore.

at that vcore temps hit 69 70 c in realtemp distance to tj.max was still 30c and realtemp has been calibrated so 70 means cores hitting thermal limite of 74c if i am right if i am wrong someone please correct me

stable temps @3.8 are 58c with an ambient of 25c in my house
 
In all honesty, I really don't think you'd see that much higher performance that what you're getting now. What you're already running is indeed rather powerful; the most you'd get beyond that point would be insignificant at best.

But, on another note, that processor is capable of going beyond 4 GHz, but it would probably require that you raise the voltage more. If you can't get it at 1.42, then for the longevity of your processor, you might want to stop.
 

■The Vcore limit for your E7200 45nm CPU is 1.3625 in CPU-Z under 100% workload with Prime95 Small FFT's.

■Intel's 74.1c thermal limit shown in their Processor Spec Finder - http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SLAPC - is Tcase (CPU temperature) not Tjunction (Core temperature), which is a very common misconception.

■The difference between CPU temperature and Core temperature is a known value, which is 5c at Load, and is shown on page 4, figure 5 in the following Intel document - http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0709/0709.1861.pdf

At Standard Ambient 22c, you still have some headroom. If you want to learn how to test, calibrate and monitor your temperatures, then check out the Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/221745-29-core-quad-temperature-guide

From the Guide:

Section 6: Scale

Scale 1: Duo
E8x00: Tcase Max 74c, Stepping E0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E7x00: Tcase Max 74c, Stepping M0,TDP 65W, Idle 8W<--E7200
E5300: Tcase Max 74c, Stepping R0,TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E5200: Tcase Max 74c, Stepping M0,TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E4700: Tcase Max 73c, Stepping G0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E4x00: Tcase Max 73c, Stepping M0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E2xx0: Tcase Max 73c, Stepping M0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E8600: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping E0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E8xx0: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping C0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E6x50: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping G0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E6540: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping G0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W

-Tcase/Tjunction-
--70--/--75--75-- Hot
--65--/--70--70-- Warm
--60--/--65--65-- Safe
--25--/--30--30-- Cool

Tcase = CPU temperature
Tjunction = Core temperature

Hope this helps,

Comp :sol:
 
e7200 often hits a HUGE wall at 4 ghz

the e5200 is the better overclocker for budgets
 
compu from my understanding then i am only on the warm side of things and i have read through toms temp guide thanks i am using tj.max and i really just don't like speedfan thanks for all the help folks

another note can anyone think of a good upgrade that cpu that would not just be wasting money when i will be buying an I7 in a couple of months