It's a good drive, and it will be fast when you are reading or writing data to Windows or applications, or when you are loading maps, levels, textures, game files, etc. or saving games to disk, but other than that, no, it won't make performance better on your 3090 ti. Drive performance has no bearing at all on graphics card gaming performance.
What is your motherboard model? CPU model? Exact power supply model?
I have the latest bios for my motherbaord-What case, how many case fans, what direction for each case fan and what CPU cooler are you running?
Also, what resolution are you gaming at? What quality settings for most games?
What is your current motherboard BIOS version?
Just trying to figure out why you think you need a faster drive to improve gaming performance. You should be getting extremely good gaming performance with that configuration.
1440p and med to high settingsWhat case, how many case fans, what direction for each case fan and what CPU cooler are you running?
Also, what resolution are you gaming at? What quality settings for most games?
What is your current motherboard BIOS version?
Just trying to figure out why you think you need a faster drive to improve gaming performance. You should be getting extremely good gaming performance with that configuration.
yes I will do a clean install and i will use the new ssd as my main c drive for boot and gamesUserbenchmark is useless. Worse than useless. But even if we were to assume it was in some way accurate, there is nothing indicated there that would suggest a problem.
So, for 1440p, you should not be having any problems getting 144fps on that graphics card with that CPU. No problem AT ALL.
I'd recommend getting the new SSD and then do a clean install of Windows.
Sorry, please look at it on google on youtube I dont want to send any marking on my ssd, some of those things are used for rma or warrantyWhen you receive the 980 Pro, could you tell us the markings on the NAND flash chip(s)? My preliminary research tells me that these SSDs use the same NAND as the 870 Evo.
The part numbers on ICs have nothing to do with RMA or warranty. The 870 Evo is a dud product, if all the complaints in numerous forums are to be believed. I am trying to determine whether the 980 Pro uses the same NAND flash chips, in which case one would have to be wary.Sorry, please look at it on google on youtube I dont want to send any marking on my ssd, some of those things are used for rma or warranty
thx
I am pretty sure they are the same 128 layer V-NAND from same factories. Just that, they must be binning better chips for 980 PRO obviously for speed, then sub standard chips are all going to 870 EVO. Just my guess though.The part numbers on ICs have nothing to do with RMA or warranty. The 870 Evo is a dud product, if all the complaints in numerous forums are to be believed. I am trying to determine whether the 980 Pro uses the same NAND flash chips, in which case one would have to be wary.
See the failure reports in this thread:
https://www.chiphell.com/thread-2435363-1-1.html
Many users in China complain about loss of data due to bad blocks in Samsung 980 Pro. It's now reported by mainstream media in China. This usually happens when the SSD has been used for 6-12 months. Samsung in China allegedly issued a statement but it was quickly pulled off.
Indicators could be found in SMART values:
ID in AIDA64 ID in CrystalDiskInfo Attribute Description Value 160 0E Media Errors (Media and Data Integrity Errors) > 0 3 03 Available Spare < 100 (or < 0x64)
According to posts in the SSD sub in Tieba (Chinese equivalence of Reddit), the following are all affected:
- 980 Pro
- PM9A1
- 970 Evo Plus
for me the differencfe betweek the 2 was onmly $10 on neweggUnfortunately there are no Samsung products in BackBlaze's lineup:
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/ssd-edition-2021-drive-stats-review/
BTW, the difference in price for an SSD with a heatsink against one without a heatsink is AU$130. That's some very expensive metalwork.
https://www.samsung.com/au/memory-storage/ssd/