Om wanting to buy a ps4, and was thinking on buying 4k display to use it with and for tv, but ps4 games dont run smoothly at 4k yet so ill prob wont play on 4k ill use the res that gets 60fps, so is it worth getting a 4k display? Will it look better even if im not running it at 4k res?
Should i get a 4k monitor
- Thread starter alridium
- Start date
based on that logic, no.
PS4 can't do 60 at 4k
PS5 can't do it either. Why? because so far only GPU that can somewhat do that is 1080Ti which costs more than planned for PS5 would and it requires more power than PS5's PSU can give. 1080Ti's are not and will not be in PS5.
performance/watt will not double from 1080Ti and as such it can't do 60fps@4k.
Yes, I believe things could look better upscaled to 4k than on original due to better anti-aliasing and thus less jagged pixel like edges.
Also bear in mind that for TV use, unless you have separate box for storing/transmitting TV content, normal display will not work, they don't have antenna input.
If you get a TV, rare few of them support 60FPS input. Yes, their refresh rate might be 120, 200 or even 400hz but that is just there to lessen the ghosting effects.
Most TV's also include awful input lag due to their inbuilt image processing. Some TV's have dedicated computer input port where said things are skipped that helps with it for the most part.
Long story short.
console and 4k@60FPS.. nope, not now, possibly in 4 to 5 years?
TV and 60 FPS, nope, not now, possibly in 2 to 3 years.
PS4 and 4k screen, possibly.. PS4 can upscale images pretty decently and they can look pretty. You can also benefit from 4k with other content also.
That is just my opinion though.
PS4 can't do 60 at 4k
PS5 can't do it either. Why? because so far only GPU that can somewhat do that is 1080Ti which costs more than planned for PS5 would and it requires more power than PS5's PSU can give. 1080Ti's are not and will not be in PS5.
performance/watt will not double from 1080Ti and as such it can't do 60fps@4k.
Yes, I believe things could look better upscaled to 4k than on original due to better anti-aliasing and thus less jagged pixel like edges.
Also bear in mind that for TV use, unless you have separate box for storing/transmitting TV content, normal display will not work, they don't have antenna input.
If you get a TV, rare few of them support 60FPS input. Yes, their refresh rate might be 120, 200 or even 400hz but that is just there to lessen the ghosting effects.
Most TV's also include awful input lag due to their inbuilt image processing. Some TV's have dedicated computer input port where said things are skipped that helps with it for the most part.
Long story short.
console and 4k@60FPS.. nope, not now, possibly in 4 to 5 years?
TV and 60 FPS, nope, not now, possibly in 2 to 3 years.
PS4 and 4k screen, possibly.. PS4 can upscale images pretty decently and they can look pretty. You can also benefit from 4k with other content also.
That is just my opinion though.
You're pretty much always better off running a monitor at its native resolution if possible. If you aren't going to be displaying 4K content, I don't see any reason to get a 4K TV (unless you anticipate displaying 4K content on it sometime in the not too distant future).
TRENDING THREADS
-
-
-
Review AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Review: Devastating Gaming Performance- Started by Admin
- Replies: 201
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram