From personal experience M.2. drives have been slightly more dodgy for me after I got a Kingston NV2 4TB which I installed alongside 2 other NV2 4TB drives (the one with Windows failed after abt 6 months and I cannot boot my PC up so waiting on it being repaired). However I have currently never (aside from a 1TB SSHD drive) had a SATA 6 drive fail me so far.
That being said I had a quick look and on r/buildapc someone says to not put the Windows install on SATA drives? Whilst I know a PCIE 4.0 M.2. might be faster to actually get a decent one (I am avoiding going for QLC and opting for TLC, MLC or SLC M.2.s if I get any) it'd cost me around £220ish+ whereas I can get a respectable SATA 6 drive for £180ish?
Planned Build:
This would be for a Heavily Modded Minecraft Server (I intend to start us on the 2TB drive and later upgrade to 4TB drives which is why the 4TB drives register as £0 instead of around £180ish)
That being said I had a quick look and on r/buildapc someone says to not put the Windows install on SATA drives? Whilst I know a PCIE 4.0 M.2. might be faster to actually get a decent one (I am avoiding going for QLC and opting for TLC, MLC or SLC M.2.s if I get any) it'd cost me around £220ish+ whereas I can get a respectable SATA 6 drive for £180ish?
Planned Build: