ok so i have 4 ssds and 3 HDDs. What i wanted to do was take the 4 ssd's and run them in a raid 0 array. then take the information in the raid 0 array and back it up to my HDD. a raid 0+1 array was mentioned but im not sure if you can use raid 0+1 to run 4 SSDs in an raid 0 array run the raid 0 array in a raid 1 array backing up to a single HDD. you would need to keep it even numbers wouldn't you? so you would need 8 hdds (4 in the raid 0 then an additional 4 for the raid 1 array correct? or will raid 1 work with 1 hdd?)... I know im going to hear a lot of poo about data back up and data loss and that will essentially if 1 out of the 4 dies ill lose everything in a raid 0 array.. i honestly don't care its for gaming/speed my laptop is for important stuff big whoop you format all the drives install windows with a pen drive and copy all the data back to it while you do something else big whoop however i hoped the raid 0+1 would work so i didn't have to go to that extra work i could just replace the drive and use the hdd to repair the array... i don't expect my hdds to die since they are nice not cheap junk ones. any suggestions to accomplish this?
P.S. Raid zero separates all the data onto 4 ssd's (not always evenly per program/file to all ssds but in the end it averages out somewhat evenly data wise per hdd) correct so when it comes down to it, it is accessing the single ssd less often if it splits 4 ways increasing the time it takes to use the full life an ssd (setting aside the chance you got unlucky and got a crappy ssd that dies quickly)has vs doing all those writes to just 1 ssd (that has the same odds of being a crappy ssd that malfunctions early in its life) and using it more accelerating its death in comparison to using 4 correct? and with write limitations and write endurance being a problem with ssd's why is it so few people think this way?
P.S. Raid zero separates all the data onto 4 ssd's (not always evenly per program/file to all ssds but in the end it averages out somewhat evenly data wise per hdd) correct so when it comes down to it, it is accessing the single ssd less often if it splits 4 ways increasing the time it takes to use the full life an ssd (setting aside the chance you got unlucky and got a crappy ssd that dies quickly)has vs doing all those writes to just 1 ssd (that has the same odds of being a crappy ssd that malfunctions early in its life) and using it more accelerating its death in comparison to using 4 correct? and with write limitations and write endurance being a problem with ssd's why is it so few people think this way?