Is it just me or anyone else things the same way...
Why 18 cores like the Intel Xeon E5-2699 V3 2.3GHz 18 Cores (Retail at US$4,500.00)
Why is technology slowly evolving towards the increasing the speeds of the GHz?
18 Cores, but only at 2.3GHz...
I can see 4, 6 or maybe 8 cores since a lot of people actually multi-task, but 18 Cores? Really???
Me personally I like speed on a single task, that's why I choose the AMD FX-9590 4.7GHz over the Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz. Am I the only one annoyed to see CPU's evolving towards cores ratter than GHz?
Why 18 cores like the Intel Xeon E5-2699 V3 2.3GHz 18 Cores (Retail at US$4,500.00)
Why is technology slowly evolving towards the increasing the speeds of the GHz?
18 Cores, but only at 2.3GHz...

I can see 4, 6 or maybe 8 cores since a lot of people actually multi-task, but 18 Cores? Really???
Me personally I like speed on a single task, that's why I choose the AMD FX-9590 4.7GHz over the Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz. Am I the only one annoyed to see CPU's evolving towards cores ratter than GHz?
