Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain (More info?)
Shenan Stanley Wrote:
> robr wrote:-
> I recently build a new computer with a ASRock K7S41GX motherboard,
> 512
> Mb DDR400 RAM and AMD SEMPRON 2400+ processor( clock speed 1666Mhz ).
> I installed Win XP Pro on it NTFS file format with a cluster size of
> 4096.-
>
> Ok.
> -
> Now my old computer is a 512 Mb RAM PC133 system, Athlon XP1600+ (
> clock speed 1400Mhz )processor and Win XP Pro but on FAT32.
> My new computer is much slower than the old computer.-
>
> Please define "much slower".
>
> What is "much slower" about it? When you copy files from one place to
> another on the same hard drive? From one hard drive to another on the
> same
> system? From one system to another across a network? Does it take
> longer
> to boot? Take longer to shutdown? Take longer to open applications?
> Do
> games run slower?
>
> More specific information would be a great help in helping you figure
> out
> the issue.
> -
> There are two things I like to know. What is people's experience with
> different file systems ( FAT 32 versus NFTS ) and cluster size
> related
> to performance of computer ?? Also, my motherboard specs say max RAM
> it can handle is DDR333. I have DDR400 installed. Could this be the
> problem ??-
>
> Could be. However, if the RAM was truthfully incompatable, you would
> have
> had problems (likely) before this. You will notice a slow-down in some
> disk
> related activities between FAT32 and NTFS if you notice nano to milli
> seconds of time a lot in your normal life.
> -
> I have checked other things like Spyware, programs running in
> background, virusses, etc. No problems there.
> Your comments please.-
>
> When did the slow-down start? Was it immediately noticed when you
> first
> installed Windows XP? Did you upgrade all the drivers, check for BIOS
> upgrades, fully patch the operating systems and applications running on
> it?
>
> --
> - Shenan -
> --
> Thanks, Shenan
>
> If you read my reply to Guy it tells you a bit more on what is going
> slow on my computer. It's slow loading and running programs. Probably
> by seconds it's slower because it is really noticeable. I haven't run
> any games yet although I made a partition for them.
>
> You said, if RAM is incompatible I would have noticed slower computer
> straight away. Well, from the first time I booted and run my computer
> it was slow. So could it be the RAM ?? The answers I got from searching
> the net are confusing. Some say using DDR400 RAM on a DDR333 RAM
> motherboard could improve performance. Others say having DDR400 RAM
> already now will save you money later if you upgrade to a DDR400 RAM
> motherboard later. Nobody actually said you couldn't run DDR400 RAM on
> a motherboard with max spec of DDR333 RAM.
>
> I have the latest BIOS version. WINDOWS XP Servicepack 2 installed plus
> the latest updates on that installed. All the latest drivers
> downloaded.
>
> I myself feel it could be that the DDR333 RAM motherboard can't handle
> the DDR400 RAM. But I never have found a conclusive answer about that
> on the Net. So I am not sure.
--
robr
Shenan Stanley Wrote:
> robr wrote:-
> I recently build a new computer with a ASRock K7S41GX motherboard,
> 512
> Mb DDR400 RAM and AMD SEMPRON 2400+ processor( clock speed 1666Mhz ).
> I installed Win XP Pro on it NTFS file format with a cluster size of
> 4096.-
>
> Ok.
> -
> Now my old computer is a 512 Mb RAM PC133 system, Athlon XP1600+ (
> clock speed 1400Mhz )processor and Win XP Pro but on FAT32.
> My new computer is much slower than the old computer.-
>
> Please define "much slower".
>
> What is "much slower" about it? When you copy files from one place to
> another on the same hard drive? From one hard drive to another on the
> same
> system? From one system to another across a network? Does it take
> longer
> to boot? Take longer to shutdown? Take longer to open applications?
> Do
> games run slower?
>
> More specific information would be a great help in helping you figure
> out
> the issue.
> -
> There are two things I like to know. What is people's experience with
> different file systems ( FAT 32 versus NFTS ) and cluster size
> related
> to performance of computer ?? Also, my motherboard specs say max RAM
> it can handle is DDR333. I have DDR400 installed. Could this be the
> problem ??-
>
> Could be. However, if the RAM was truthfully incompatable, you would
> have
> had problems (likely) before this. You will notice a slow-down in some
> disk
> related activities between FAT32 and NTFS if you notice nano to milli
> seconds of time a lot in your normal life.
> -
> I have checked other things like Spyware, programs running in
> background, virusses, etc. No problems there.
> Your comments please.-
>
> When did the slow-down start? Was it immediately noticed when you
> first
> installed Windows XP? Did you upgrade all the drivers, check for BIOS
> upgrades, fully patch the operating systems and applications running on
> it?
>
> --
> - Shenan -
> --
> Thanks, Shenan
>
> If you read my reply to Guy it tells you a bit more on what is going
> slow on my computer. It's slow loading and running programs. Probably
> by seconds it's slower because it is really noticeable. I haven't run
> any games yet although I made a partition for them.
>
> You said, if RAM is incompatible I would have noticed slower computer
> straight away. Well, from the first time I booted and run my computer
> it was slow. So could it be the RAM ?? The answers I got from searching
> the net are confusing. Some say using DDR400 RAM on a DDR333 RAM
> motherboard could improve performance. Others say having DDR400 RAM
> already now will save you money later if you upgrade to a DDR400 RAM
> motherboard later. Nobody actually said you couldn't run DDR400 RAM on
> a motherboard with max spec of DDR333 RAM.
>
> I have the latest BIOS version. WINDOWS XP Servicepack 2 installed plus
> the latest updates on that installed. All the latest drivers
> downloaded.
>
> I myself feel it could be that the DDR333 RAM motherboard can't handle
> the DDR400 RAM. But I never have found a conclusive answer about that
> on the Net. So I am not sure.
--
robr