few days ago my nephew tried playing with the psu socket and inserting different wires in it and eventually killing half of my rig, so i had to switch to my old pc, a radeon hd 5670 with a core 2 quad q6600 and 8gb of ddr3 (salvaged from the old rig).
when i started playing games i couldn't bear the jaggies all over the picture and i knew MSAA is already a BIG FAT NO on a card like this.
so i went on searching for a good way to remove aliasing without taking half the framerate away, and i stumbled upon injectors like reshade and sweetfx.
i went on and installed reshade on on battlefield 3 and enabled SMAA, and the framerate was cut in half, switched to reshade's FXAA= same thing.
enabled in game FXAA on high and almost non-existent performance hit.
went to other games like the original cod 4(killhouse baby), same happens; SMAA enabled going from 125 fps all the way down to 60 fps, enabled in-game 4x anti aliasing(not sure what type though) and i get 80 fps.
supposedly, the SMAA and the FXAA has minimal performance penalty as opposed to regular MSAA, like 3 or 5 fps, am i doing something wrong here?
thanks in advance.
when i started playing games i couldn't bear the jaggies all over the picture and i knew MSAA is already a BIG FAT NO on a card like this.
so i went on searching for a good way to remove aliasing without taking half the framerate away, and i stumbled upon injectors like reshade and sweetfx.
i went on and installed reshade on on battlefield 3 and enabled SMAA, and the framerate was cut in half, switched to reshade's FXAA= same thing.
enabled in game FXAA on high and almost non-existent performance hit.
went to other games like the original cod 4(killhouse baby), same happens; SMAA enabled going from 125 fps all the way down to 60 fps, enabled in-game 4x anti aliasing(not sure what type though) and i get 80 fps.
supposedly, the SMAA and the FXAA has minimal performance penalty as opposed to regular MSAA, like 3 or 5 fps, am i doing something wrong here?
thanks in advance.