so when can I put buy a 6800 ultra

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Any links for sale yet online?

--
killin@u.com

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"FatDaddy" <KillinU@worm.com> wrote in message
news:seCdnZmk1OSW4xTdRVn-hw@comcast.com...
>
> Any links for sale yet online?
>
> --
> killin@u.com
>
>
I bet you don't see any for sale until June or July.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"FatDaddy" <KillinU@worm.com> wrote in message
news:seCdnZmk1OSW4xTdRVn-hw@comcast.com...
>
> Any links for sale yet online?
>
> --
> killin@u.com

Why not wait til ATI releases their new card and then make a performance
comparison and pick the best card .

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Because ATI is not an option. They have a lifelong history of being
buggy, horrible support and finicky. There actually IS more to life
(and video cards) than cheated up FPS scores.



On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:49:23 -0300, "Reggie Hillier"
<reggiehillier@hfx.eastlink.ca> wrote:

>
>"FatDaddy" <KillinU@worm.com> wrote in message
>news:seCdnZmk1OSW4xTdRVn-hw@comcast.com...
>>
>> Any links for sale yet online?
>>
>> --
>> killin@u.com
>
>Why not wait til ATI releases their new card and then make a performance
>comparison and pick the best card .
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"JBM" <jmanning95@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:vo2dnU5BqNYuHBTdRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
>
> "FatDaddy" <KillinU@worm.com> wrote in message
> news:seCdnZmk1OSW4xTdRVn-hw@comcast.com...
> >
> > Any links for sale yet online?
> >

www4.alternate.de

gainward U2400 nvidia 6800 256mb 399 euro

CoolFX U2600 6800u 849 256mb gddr3 849 Euro

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

June at the earliest.

--
DaveW



"FatDaddy" <KillinU@worm.com> wrote in message
news:seCdnZmk1OSW4xTdRVn-hw@comcast.com...
>
> Any links for sale yet online?
>
> --
> killin@u.com
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

<Judge> wrote in message news:lvaj80poha9um71vjclgdvbrgb16catgt1@4ax.com...
> Because ATI is not an option. They have a lifelong history of being
> buggy, horrible support and finicky. There actually IS more to life
> (and video cards) than cheated up FPS scores.


Well....there is an unbiased opinion ! Who peed in your cereal !

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Judge <> wrote in message news:<lvaj80poha9um71vjclgdvbrgb16catgt1@4ax.com>...
> Because ATI is not an option. They have a lifelong history of being
> buggy, horrible support and finicky. There actually IS more to life
> (and video cards) than cheated up FPS scores.
>

It seems you have a slight grudge against Ati... mmm..only slight!

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

I was a huge Nvidia fan, having pretty much all their generation cards
through the Ti series.
However, they lost me to ATI, have had a 9700 Pro and now a 9800 Pro. Both
built by ATI, and not a glitch with either one.
Maybe Nvidia can get back in the game, which would be good , after all good
competition benefits us the consuemer- but imho, ATI has had them beat hands
down for the past year.
Now , if the 6800 proves to be better than ATI's next offering, I will
strongly consider moving back to Nvidia.

Don Burnette



Judge wrote:
> Because ATI is not an option. They have a lifelong history of being
> buggy, horrible support and finicky. There actually IS more to life
> (and video cards) than cheated up FPS scores.
>
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:49:23 -0300, "Reggie Hillier"
> <reggiehillier@hfx.eastlink.ca> wrote:
>
>>
>> "FatDaddy" <KillinU@worm.com> wrote in message
>> news:seCdnZmk1OSW4xTdRVn-hw@comcast.com...
>>>
>>> Any links for sale yet online?
>>>
>>> --
>>> killin@u.com
>>
>> Why not wait til ATI releases their new card and then make a
>> performance comparison and pick the best card .

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Judge <> brightened my day with his incisive wit when in
news:lvaj80poha9um71vjclgdvbrgb16catgt1@4ax.com he conjectured that:

> Because ATI is not an option. They have a lifelong history of being
> buggy, horrible support and finicky. There actually IS more to life
> (and video cards) than cheated up FPS scores.
>

You're a bloody idiot. Its NVidia who have been cheating recently. The ATI
drivers are excellent. Their cards (up until the 6800) are the fastest.
Just why would you mislead someone so badly?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

With a 6800 you will almost need a seperate power supply *JUST* for that
video card, plus you need 1 or 2 more PCI slots just to make way for the
extremely large cooler needed on the nVidia card.

Of course my 9800Pro isnt as powerfull, but I can use it in my current PC,
and even the stock cooler (doesnt block the other PCI slots) it runs quiet,
and cool enough. With a single molex power connected to it.


"Walter Mitty" <mitticus.remo.veme@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns94D5B69BCACB7waltermitty@127.0.0.1...
> Judge <> brightened my day with his incisive wit when in
> news:lvaj80poha9um71vjclgdvbrgb16catgt1@4ax.com he conjectured that:
>
> > Because ATI is not an option. They have a lifelong history of being
> > buggy, horrible support and finicky. There actually IS more to life
> > (and video cards) than cheated up FPS scores.
> >
>
> You're a bloody idiot. Its NVidia who have been cheating recently. The ATI
> drivers are excellent. Their cards (up until the 6800) are the fastest.
> Just why would you mislead someone so badly?