Hi there!
So, I'm planning this haswell-based mini-itx rig. It's intended to run as cool and quiet as possible, and will use the processor's integrated graphics (no gaming whatsoever). My initial plan was to put one of the i5-4xxxS in it (prob 4570s), mainly for its low thermal output, but when looking into it a bit further it seems like an i3-4340 should be just as good, if not better, for general use (for example: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i3-4340-4330-4130_4.html#sect1 ), and they both have the hd4600 IGP. Moreover, it's significantly cheaper (30€ gap currently between 4670s and 4340). I would call it a no brainer, but what's holding me back is the thought that in certain scenarios, especially music encoding (high quality cd ripping), I will regret not choosing the i5.
So...after this too long epilogue, the questions:
-- how big of a difference in performance is there between the top i3 and a mid-range i5-4xx0s? All the info I find is about normal power i5 (84w), but almost nothing about the low power ones. Is there any sense in buying a pricier, low power i5 just because it has 2 more cores, just "in case I might need them"?
-- now for the mobo: it's either h87i-plus or z87i-pro, both from Asus, because I like the 6x sata and the centrally located CPU socket. I don't need any of the Z's OC features, but i like its superior audio chip, as well as the Bluetooth. There's a 50€ difference between them which is a lot, but I could cover some of it with the saving on the CPU. Worth it or not?
Any comments are welcome. Thanks!
So, I'm planning this haswell-based mini-itx rig. It's intended to run as cool and quiet as possible, and will use the processor's integrated graphics (no gaming whatsoever). My initial plan was to put one of the i5-4xxxS in it (prob 4570s), mainly for its low thermal output, but when looking into it a bit further it seems like an i3-4340 should be just as good, if not better, for general use (for example: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core-i3-4340-4330-4130_4.html#sect1 ), and they both have the hd4600 IGP. Moreover, it's significantly cheaper (30€ gap currently between 4670s and 4340). I would call it a no brainer, but what's holding me back is the thought that in certain scenarios, especially music encoding (high quality cd ripping), I will regret not choosing the i5.
So...after this too long epilogue, the questions:
-- how big of a difference in performance is there between the top i3 and a mid-range i5-4xx0s? All the info I find is about normal power i5 (84w), but almost nothing about the low power ones. Is there any sense in buying a pricier, low power i5 just because it has 2 more cores, just "in case I might need them"?
-- now for the mobo: it's either h87i-plus or z87i-pro, both from Asus, because I like the 6x sata and the centrally located CPU socket. I don't need any of the Z's OC features, but i like its superior audio chip, as well as the Bluetooth. There's a 50€ difference between them which is a lot, but I could cover some of it with the saving on the CPU. Worth it or not?
Any comments are welcome. Thanks!