Sony Vaio Z Laptop Packs Quad-SSDs in RAID 0

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

Guest

Guest
I would seriously consider buying this instead of a desktop. If only I had a job...
 

jhansonxi

Distinguished
May 11, 2007
1,262
0
19,280
I would rather have RAID 1 for redundancy and get rid of the OS. I hope Nvidia has their chip reliability problem fixed. I would hate to have to pay for a new board in one of these.
 

RooD

Distinguished
Jul 5, 2004
213
0
18,680
Now you can ower through the bloatware... and correct me if im wrong but doesnt raid zero do almost nothing for performance with ssd's
 

kyeana

Distinguished
May 21, 2008
1,290
0
19,310
Quad SSD? Seems like a bit of overkill to me...unless this is supposed to double as a portable server or something equally creepy...
 

one-shot

Distinguished
Jan 13, 2006
1,369
0
19,310
"No pricing is announced yet, but expect them to in at under $2,000."

Yay for proofreading.

It would be interesting to know what Brand of SSDs are used. One would think even 2 SSDs in RAID 0 would already be at the SATA 3Gb/s limit. Unless it is SATA 6Gb/s which seems to soon to be implemented into a laptop.
 

El_Capitan

Distinguished
Mar 17, 2009
431
0
18,810
1920 x 1080 in a 13.1 inch screen? 3.2 pounds? Definitely worth considering, though I've known people with bad issues with Vaio's, so never had one. However, that was over 6 years ago. It would be good to know the types of SSD drives they got in there, and some real benchmarks including battery life. Still, as much as I love portability (5 hours on my 1200 x 800 14-inch screen), I need at least a 1920 x 1080 screen resolution (1920 x 1200 is perfect, but you get what you can with anything below 17" screens).
 

jblack

Distinguished
Oct 5, 2009
118
0
18,690
[citation][nom]one-shot[/nom]One would think even 2 SSDs in RAID 0 would already be at the SATA 3Gb/s limit. Unless it is SATA 6Gb/s which seems to soon to be implemented into a laptop.[/citation]


The 3Gb/s limit doesn't apply if they plug each of the 4 SSDs into seperate sata ports.
 

Socnom

Distinguished
Aug 28, 2008
88
0
18,630
I think this fails because of a HD screen with no Blue Ray. Kind of like a Ferrari with a 4 cylinder. All that potential, but crippled with the lack of hardware.
 

one-shot

Distinguished
Jan 13, 2006
1,369
0
19,310
[citation][nom]jblack[/nom]The 3Gb/s limit doesn't apply if they plug each of the 4 SSDs into seperate sata ports.[/citation]

Yes, you're right. That makes much more sense. I'm not sure what I was thinking when I typed that. Thanks.
 

diablocricki

Distinguished
Jan 14, 2010
6
0
18,510
Not saying it's good or bad, I just don't understand the logic behind such a small screen with 1920/1080 resolution. Can one even read anything on that? Or is it strictly for games/video playback? I would appreciate constructive answers. Thank you.
 

acecombat

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2009
213
0
18,680
[citation][nom]jhansonxi[/nom]I would rather have RAID 1 for redundancy and get rid of the OS. I hope Nvidia has their chip reliability problem fixed. I would hate to have to pay for a new board in one of these.[/citation]
I wouldn't want 4 pricey SSDs in Raid1. Not much good being mirrored that many times, if anything other than what is offered I'd take Raid10 for both speed and reliability!
 
G

Guest

Guest
"No pricing is announced yet, but expect them to come in at under $2,000."

Seeing is believing.
 

coopchennick

Distinguished
Dec 3, 2008
166
0
18,680
I think this is more marketing than real performance. The ssds they'll put in there are surely not going to be intels, I doubt the vertex either.

I'd take 2 x25-ms or just wait a little while longer and put one vertex 2 in there
 

razzb3d

Distinguished
Apr 2, 2009
163
0
18,690
ok, how does 1920 x 1080 in a 13.1 inch screen help? especially with a low end GF330 vga card?

i cant read on a 15.4" 1680x1050 screen, let alone 1920x1080.... and selecting lower resolution makes everything look fuzzy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.