Speakers in Glass Houses for $1,000

Status
Not open for further replies.

wildwell

Distinguished
Sep 19, 2009
658
0
19,060
Glass doesn't seem like it would sound good as a speaker enclosure? Then again, it doesn't really matter since I'm not gonna waste $1k on those little things.
 

AMW1011

Distinguished
Glass enclosures aren't new, they just aren't common. A glass enclosure is supposed to give a slightly boomy bass while retaining definition and clarity. The trade off? Very suppressed mids. At least that is the general quality, these may be made from any sort of clear material and the shape may have a large impact on the performance. I'd give them a listen before righting them off. Oh and is it me or does the writer seem to think that $999 MSRP for a pair of new and just released speakers is only for the enthusiast? Blowing $1000 on good speakers is extremely easy for those so inclined, its the ones with thousands in their other equipment, not counting speakers, that are verging on the ridiculous.
 

superblahman123

Distinguished
Mar 26, 2009
144
0
18,680
Add a little "bling to your ring"? Not these anyway lol.

I would expect these things to be made out of crystal before I buy them, but thats not even saying that I would anyway. Not even a subwoofer for $1k!
I could see some richies/artists get these, but only because they can, but I could guarantee they'd be disappointed with them w/o a subwoofer.
 

Supertrek32

Distinguished
Nov 13, 2008
442
0
18,780
[citation][nom]AMW1011[/nom]Glass enclosures aren't new, they just aren't common. A glass enclosure is supposed to give a slightly boomy bass while retaining definition and clarity. The trade off? Very suppressed mids. At least that is the general quality, these may be made from any sort of clear material and the shape may have a large impact on the performance. I'd give them a listen before righting them off. Oh and is it me or does the writer seem to think that $999 MSRP for a pair of new and just released speakers is only for the enthusiast? Blowing $1000 on good speakers is extremely easy for those so inclined, its the ones with thousands in their other equipment, not counting speakers, that are verging on the ridiculous.[/citation]
Wouldn't being inclined to buy $1000 speakers then give you the title of enthusiast? Unless you're a professional, of course, but then you wouldn't be concerned with this pair of $1000 speakers anyway and would be springing for well known, professional-grade speakers.
 

gorehound

Distinguished
Jan 16, 2009
396
0
18,780
MY speakers are really good.
ATC Professional Studio Monitors
They have an awesome sound and I also use these to mix and master music.
 

amabhy

Distinguished
Sep 11, 2009
97
0
18,630
Nice specs, but they look like rabbit shit.

If I saw those on a friends desk I would probably be like yo you pick that shit up off the street or something?
 

NoCaDrummer

Distinguished
Aug 2, 2008
104
0
18,680
Not just expensive, ugly and impractical (what if they tip over or are dropped?) but glass is NOT a particularly good building material. It's hard (though technically a "liquid") transmits sound at a high speed, is not self-damping (tap a wine glass to get an idea of the "ring" it produces) and is difficult to work with. Polycarbonate would have been a better enclosure material if you absolutely must have "clear" loudspeakers. But we're talking something similar to that used at the bank, not CD jewelboxes.
I'm just waiting for someone to play Ella Fitzgerald and have them shatter!
 

techguy378

Distinguished
Jul 14, 2009
449
0
18,780
I would love to have a pair of speakers like these that I could use with my home theater receiver's Audyssey MultEQ software. Audyssey can make the worst speaker sound like a speaker that costs thousands of dollars.
 

Socnom

Distinguished
Aug 28, 2008
88
0
18,630
Unlike the rest of the Electronic world, Speakers do not become obsolete. They either work or they don't. I can see someone shelling out big bucks on speakers, its not like they will be replaced in 1 year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.