Sprint employee OK's losing $27 million

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <7e761144.0404260513.1009b639@posting.google.com>,
pcsguy@bellsouth.net (TechGeek) wrote:

> He posts insults, but he doesn't call them
> insults, just says that they qualify for the insults (which is also an
> insult), but then complains when others insult him.

You will not find a single post where I use bad language or explitives,
unlike Veldhouse, Smith and others.


When folks claim one thing and have posted something else, they are
properly called liars.

When they childishly post bad language, it is proper to label them for
what they are.

When lauer makes promises and doesnt fulfill them, he shouyldn't get a
bonus of 30 times his salary.

You never told us how big a bonus you got for 2003.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <B6bjc.962$Rk3.47@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com>,
"Chris Russell" <noone@nowhere.nospam> wrote:

> You are the one bragging about your many thank yous, I'm not going to bother
> w/Google to look up your BS.

Fine, but I did and found you like to call people you disagree with
"moron".

 

[Eric]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

Since Robert M./Phillipe/Cell Merger is a self-proclaimed whistleblower,
and wants to expose all of Sprint's "secrets"... why don't we try and
expose some of his secrets? After all, if he feels like he has a right
to know everything about Sprint PCS and all of their "secrets", why
shouldn't we know all about him and his little "secrets"?
1. What's with all the name/email/user id changes? He claims its not to
get around people's killfiles... but rather it's "because he can".
Shhhh! It must be a SECRET.
2. His claims about his kids' SAT scores. "They" got a 1536 (or
something like that). Did all of his kids get the exact same SAT score?
Are they really that smart, just like him?? Shhh! It must be a SECRET.
3. He claims he was never an AT&T wireless customer, but yet they were
billing him. So much so that he had to get into "talks" with their
"lawyers" and refuses to answer any direct questions about it because of
a "non-disclosure agreement". Shhh! It must be a SECRET.
4. Why does he post like he knows it all over in the Cingular and AT&T
groups? He has never been a customer of theirs, but yet he's over there
posting like he's an expert... trashing them as much as he can. Why?
Shhh! It must be a SECRET.
5. What's with his misquoting of people? Why does he only pick out a
small phrase or comment out of a long detailed post, and then either
misquote it or twist it around and make it mean something entirely
different? Shhhh! Must be a SECRET.
6. Why is he so anxious to be holier-than-thou, quickly dismissing
anyone who uses bad language or insults? But yet when his good buddy
Justin did it (multiple, multiple times) last summer -- swearing up a
storm in many of his posts -- Phillipe *never* said anything negative
about him. Why? Shhh!!! It must be a SECRET.
7. What is his reasoning to expose the real email address in certain
peoples' posting ids here (i.e. like what he does to Bob Smith)? And
when confronted about it, he says nothing, knowing full well it is a
horrible thing to do. Why? Shhhhh! It must be a SECRET.

 

[Eric]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

rmarkoff@msn.com (Robert M.) wrote:
<<Fine, but I did and found you like to call people you disagree with
"moron". >>

PERSON... not people. The second quoted post was one directed at you
(an alternate id of yours), so that obviously doesn't count.
Phillipe2004=Robert M.=Cell Merger=Sprint Secrets=Sunday Auto=Phil_Real

 

[techgeek]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

caperenewal@webtv.net (Eric) wrote in message news:<11791-408D1AB2-100@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net>...
>
> Did Justin give you his info to get into his account or did you do it
> without Justin's knowledge?
>
> In any case, I was just pointing out that all the times Phillipe has
> been so sensitive to foul language and insults... but when it came to
> Justin (who used "bad words" in many many of his posts as well as
> degrading insults), Phillipe never said a thing... and still talks of
> Justin like he was some kind of God.
>
> WWJD, Phillipe?

Justin posted his name and address (I don't remember if he included
the phone#) in one of his original posts, which I used to track him
down in the system.

I did try to help him with the issue he had, with reasonable steps he
could have, and should have taken. He did later admit I was a help to
him, and thanked me for it.

 

[techgeek]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

"Robert M." <rmarkoff@msn.com> wrote in message news:<rmarkoff-B4CE91.13020326042004@news05.east.earthlink.net>...
> In article <7e761144.0404260513.1009b639@posting.google.com>,
> pcsguy@bellsouth.net (TechGeek) wrote:
>
> > Then, Philippe accused me of going into Justin's account without his
> > infomration just go get his personal information.
>
> You making this up as you go along? or are you the one that told people
> to telephone his boss. Thanks for confessing.

Look at Justin's first post, he posted his name and address which left
the door wide open for anyone to get his information.

Like I said, I didn't give out any of his personal information, in
fact, the only piece of information I mentioned that he didn't in his
posts was one of the model phones he tried for a few days.

And what am I confessing?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

And it's never been proven that the RichardMNixon@watergate.com wasn't
Philly, that is who I was responding to in that post. The way Google
searches serves up archives is not in exact reply order. So, it looks like
they were all directed at you Philly.

Chris


"Eric" <caperenewal@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:18810-408D4F84-578@storefull-3231.bay.webtv.net...
rmarkoff@msn.com (Robert M.) wrote:
<<LIAR: and GOOGLE proves it: (snip) >>

Well, I think Chris was mainly stating that he only called *you* a moron
in this particular thread in reference to Mike...

But also, its INTERESTING that you could only come up with one other
case where he used the word moron. The second post you attached is
invalid since he was calling *you* a moron there, too -- yes, your other
ids count, Phillipe2004/Robert M.

Eric

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <rmarkoff-0328E1.11490725042004
@news03.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> He's the one that says $27 million is "Not much at all"
>
>

Not if you double-check your math.

You won't, of course.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <8590505ea157201e939caabeb653a1d2@news.teranews.com>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-0328E1.11490725042004
> @news03.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> > He's the one that says $27 million is "Not much at all"
> >
> >
>
> Not if you double-check your math.
>
> You won't, of course.

I'm sorry, its much more than $27 million when you include nonrecurring
items.

Now whats your math if you disgaree?

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <rmarkoff-7232DD.12263127042004
@news05.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> In article <8590505ea157201e939caabeb653a1d2@news.teranews.com>,
> O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <rmarkoff-0328E1.11490725042004
> > @news03.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> > > He's the one that says $27 million is "Not much at all"
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Not if you double-check your math.
> >
> > You won't, of course.
>
> I'm sorry, its much more than $27 million when you include nonrecurring
> items.
>
> Now whats your math if you disgaree?
>

Like I said: you won't, of course. Instead, you'll dig your
dishonesty deeper.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <3783a20d22a790e878f628f23f0141b6@news.teranews.com>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-7232DD.12263127042004
> @news05.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> > In article <8590505ea157201e939caabeb653a1d2@news.teranews.com>,
> > O/Siris <0siris@sprîntpcs.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <rmarkoff-0328E1.11490725042004
> > > @news03.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> > > > He's the one that says $27 million is "Not much at all"
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not if you double-check your math.
> > >
> > > You won't, of course.
> >
> > I'm sorry, its much more than $27 million when you include nonrecurring
> > items.
> >
> > Now whats your math if you disgaree?
> >
>
> Like I said: you won't, of course. Instead, you'll dig your
> dishonesty deeper.

You STILL haven't answer you disgrace of SprintPCS.

It's no big deal you said if SprintPCS loses $27 million, which is what a
a .2% increase in churn equals in lost revenue JUST from recurring
charges.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <rmarkoff-537C7F.04232430042004
@news04.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> It's no big deal you said if SprintPCS loses $27 million, which is what a
> a .2% increase in churn equals in lost revenue JUST from recurring
> charges.
>

You're math is still as far off as ever. Keep ranting, though,
Phillie. It's obvious you've no intention of ever *discussing*.

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <3502fd849a386bb63315c34a4c6c6ddf@news.teranews.com>,
O/Siris <osiris@sprintpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-537C7F.04232430042004
> @news04.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> > It's no big deal you said if SprintPCS loses $27 million, which is what a
> > a .2% increase in churn equals in lost revenue JUST from recurring
> > charges.
> >
>
> You're math is still as far off as ever. Keep ranting, though,
> Phillie. It's obvious you've no intention of ever *discussing*.

Saying my math is off does not make it so. It's just a LIE.
Part of your typical midnight run of insults


I posted the math, you never posted different math. YOU ARE THE LIAR
here, the disgrace of SprintPCS.


From: Robert M. (rmarkoff@msn.com)
Subject: Sprint employee OK's losing $27 million  
View this article onlyNewsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 2004-04-25 03:41:35 PST

In article <edc889105124a3cd96baaf94c2ed2911@news.teranews.com>,
O/Siris <osiris@sprintpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-3FB383.05473524042004
> @news03.east.earthlink.net>, rmarkoff@msn.com says...
> > Baloney. SprintPCS has not released the WLNP numbers that support such a
> > statement.
>
> Churn increased 0.2% in the last quarter over the previous. how bad
> can it be? Not much at all. And in line with what was predicted. A
> minimal impact.

Liar, not in line with predictions.

Let's do the math. .2% per month = 2.4% per year. With 16.3 million
customers, thats 455,200 Extra Customers Lost. At an average of
$61/month each thats $27,312,00 lost.

$27 Million + is "Not much at all" If this doesn't fit the definition
of a Blind Sprint apologist, nothing does.

Lauer also predicted SprintPCS would be a winner from WLNP and then
didnt puiblish those numbers.

Lauer also predicted decreasing costs, and then didnt publish cost of
new customer acquisition, previously outrageously high.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs (More info?)

In article <Rmm-D853AB.04465406052004@news6.west.earthlink.net>,
Rmm@yahoo.com says...
> Saying my math is off does not make it so.
>

The math shows itself, Phillie. I don't have to post it.

2x2=5 is wrong whether or not someone ever actually posts that 2x2=4

--
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them