• Hey there, Guest! Share your idea for a new trophy in the forums and win bragging rights and a $100 Amazon gift card! Check out the New Community Trophy Contest here!
  • Pardon our dust as we work on some regularly scheduled forum maintenance. You may notice some missing features during this time. Thank you for your patience!

SSD Advice - Sandisk Extreme 2 vs Crucial MX100 vs Samsung 840 Evo

1kca

Reputable
Jun 1, 2014
100
0
4,680
0
I'm struggling to choose between these three drives.

I currently have a 500GB Samsung 840 Evo as my primary drive and I'd like a second SSD, mostly due to space constraints. I won't get into it too much but I can't just add a mechanical drive for extra capacity because it will mean reintroducing HDD cages to my system

The new SSD will act as either a D drive or it will replace the existing Evo as my C drive if it's significantly faster.


It's between the:

Crucial MX100 512GB - £150
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB - £180
SanDisk Extreme 2 480GB - £190

Speed is obviously important but I'm not going to be running synthetic benchmarks on them all day so if the real world performance differences are negligible then it doesn't matter. In saying that though, the Evo should be a baseline - I wouldn't want to spend more than I spent on the Evo (£100) on a slower drive)

My main concerns are longevity, reliability and consistency


Thanks for looking
 

Rookie_MIB

Honorable
Jul 27, 2013
1,946
0
12,960
412


Agreed. It doesn't have the raw speed of the 840 Evo or the Sandisk Extreme 2, but it has an amazing price advantage, and if you're going to be using the computer as a general purpose computer, you really won't go wrong with anything really made by Crucial. They're quick, rock-solid drives (I have several of the M4's and have had ZERO problems).

 

1kca

Reputable
Jun 1, 2014
100
0
4,680
0
Yeah, I have an M500 in my laptop that's never let me down in any way. Crucial are good at what they do

So you reckon the real world performance of the Extreme 2 doesn't justify the extra £40? What if the Price difference were reduced to £10? Would the performance gains, in your opinions, justify the cost and also the loss in capacity?
 

Similar threads