SSD's are great benchmarkers. But other than that, I have been shall we say "unimpressed". If I was an frequent flier, the quick boot might hold dome value but when I arrive at the office, I push the ON switch and then head for some coffee .... when I come back, the machine is at the desktop regardless of whether it boots off the HD or SSD ...... both HD's and SSD's are SATA btw.
Here's my test results (Asus WS Revolution, i7-2600k @ 4.6 Ghz, 8 GB Mushkin CAS 7 DDR3-1600, Twin 560 Ti's @ 1000MHz):
Boot off Seagate Barracuda XT (143 MBps bench) 2 TB - 21.2 seconds
Boot off Vertex 3 SSD (550 MBps bench) 120 GB - 15.6 seconds.
You wanna spend $300 for 5.6 seconds ?
This is consistent with this youtube video which has Starcraft loading in about 2/3 the time off an SSD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1lFXGpMDf4
Loading the MMO I play (Saga of Ryzom) was a tossup. Game startup averaged about 45 seconds with the HD winning 3 outta 5 times and the SSD winning 2 outta 5 times. Methinks it had more to do with connection speed than lifting data off the storage device.
If I was doing PhotoShop, 3D Rendering, Video Editing, etc.I might be more impressed but even AutoCAD I don't see a significant difference. In all my programs, user input speed is the bottleneck, not the machine.