Disk numbering doesn't matter.Currently, the M.2 -- SATA ssd is labeled as Disk 1, while additional 2.5 inch -- SATA ssd is labeled as Disk 0, how can I swap those positions ?
I do a lot of work on DiskPart on many drives, is there any way possible to swap those positions ?Disk numbering doesn't matter.
You should not care about it.
You could reinstall windows and end up with different drive numbering.I do a lot of work on DiskPart on many drives, is there any way possible to swap those positions ?
Interesting.Windows assigns those drive numbers at random and then keeps them.
For example - I have multiple windows versions installed on the same pc with multiple drives connected.
In one windows installation drive has a different drive number than in other windows installation.
Drive is the same and sata port same too.
Moving drive to a different sata port doesn't guarantee drive number change.
I found this article:Currently, the M.2 -- SATA ssd is labeled as Disk 1, while additional 2.5 inch -- SATA ssd is labeled as Disk 0, how can I swap those positions ? M.2 is the Windows drive, the 2.5 is for storage only. Computer is a ASUS PRIME Z390 - P.
AHHH i see. I appreciate your help. So numbering is random. But even during boot process, the M.2 is first. The 2.5 is just another drive, no OS in it !!!I found this article:
https://superuser.com/questions/668...ring-enumeration-in-windows-7-disk-management
While it is speaking of Windows 7 in particular I have to imagine W10 and W11 behave similar.
My key take-aways from it are:
The numbering of disks in the system is a result of hardware enumeration during the boot process.
It does not necessarily follow a SATA port sequence, although it may change if drives are moved to a different port.
There is no control excercised by the OS over the numbering sequence and it can even change from one boot-up to another.
There are no standards or definitions that describe disk numbering or mapping requirements and any software or process that needs a stable disk number mapping is considered "bugged" by definition.
Mostly, it's servers with large disk arrays that might see wholesale numbering changes as hardware configuration is likely to change more frequently. I think disk number changes aren't likely to be encountered by home users with small disk installations, hence a misconception there should be an enduring number mapping.