ST31000528AS dying after firmware upgrade?

Status
Not open for further replies.

v80

Reputable
Apr 23, 2014
14
0
4,510
Hi,

After uying 2 new ST1000DM0003 with CC49 i decided to upgrate the firmware of the old ST31000528AS from CC38 to CC49, since i wanted to do some RAID testing and it seems good practice to match firmware versions.

The firmware upgrade went well (all other drivers were unplugged, followed all instructions, etc). While i can't confirm it 100%, it's the only major change that happened. The PC is used mostly for light OS testing (RAID, LVM, SMB, whatever), nothing disk-intensive. Well, not yet at least and not for a while apparently.

The problem is, not long after the upgrade two things happened:
1) i suddenly lost all data on one of the partitions in that drive. At first i thought it was a samba issue, then being a remote share, maybe filesystem corruption, PEBCAK, something. I did manage to recover (almost) all data.
2) ever since boot - right after POST, even before an OS is loaded, the disk starts making noise (as when it's seeking, scanning, like when you copy a large file or let the antivirus have a go at it). Seems to be heads flying. It won't stop.

This is an excerpt of a few commands i've been running:

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Seagate Barracuda 7200.12
Device Model: ST31000528AS
Serial Number:
LU WWN Device Id: 5 000c50 027db4afd
Firmware Version: CC49
User Capacity: 1,000,204,886,016 bytes [1.00 TB]
Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show]
ATA Version is: 8
ATA Standard is: ATA-8-ACS revision 4
Local Time is: Thu Apr 17 11:23:18 2014 WEST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled

...

Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGS VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate POSR-- 113 099 006 - 50643073
3 Spin_Up_Time PO---- 095 095 000 - 0
4 Start_Stop_Count -O--CK 099 099 020 - 1274
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct PO--CK 047 047 036 - 2181
7 Seek_Error_Rate POSR-- 075 060 030 - 35143152
9 Power_On_Hours -O--CK 079 079 000 - 18750
10 Spin_Retry_Count PO--C- 100 100 097 - 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count -O--CK 100 100 020 - 638
183 Runtime_Bad_Block -O--CK 100 100 000 - 0
184 End-to-End_Error -O--CK 100 100 099 - 0
187 Reported_Uncorrect -O--CK 100 100 000 - 0
188 Command_Timeout -O--CK 100 099 000 - 1
189 High_Fly_Writes -O-RCK 100 100 000 - 0
190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel -O---K 071 051 045 - 29 (Min/Max 22/29)
194 Temperature_Celsius -O---K 029 049 000 - 29 (0 11 0 0)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered -O-RC- 026 018 000 - 50643073
197 Current_Pending_Sector -O--C- 100 100 000 - 0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable ----C- 100 100 000 - 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count -OSRCK 200 200 000 - 0
240 Head_Flying_Hours ------ 100 253 000 - 178838143258596
241 Total_LBAs_Written ------ 100 253 000 - 1457922426
242 Total_LBAs_Read ------ 100 253 000 - 1552877542
||||||_ K auto-keep
|||||__ C event count
||||___ R error rate
|||____ S speed/performance
||_____ O updated online
|______ P prefailure warning

...

SMART Extended Comprehensive Error Log Version: 1 (5 sectors)
No Errors Logged

SMART Extended Self-test Log Version: 1 (1 sectors)
Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 18746 -
# 2 Extended offline Aborted by host 90% 18742 -
# 3 Extended offline Interrupted (host reset) 90% 18742 -
# 4 Short offline Interrupted (host reset) 00% 18741 -
# 5 Short offline Completed without error 00% 18653 -

Some tests just keep showing at 90%, even if i let them run for twice the estimated ammount of time.
This shows at boot: "Incorrect metadata area header checksum on /dev/sdd1 at offset 4096"

SATA Phy Event Counters (GP Log 0x11)
ID Size Value Description
0x000a 2 1 Device-to-host register FISes sent due to a COMRESET
0x0001 2 0 Command failed due to ICRC error
0x0003 2 0 R_ERR response for device-to-host data FIS
0x0004 2 0 R_ERR response for host-to-device data FIS
0x0006 2 0 R_ERR response for device-to-host non-data FIS
0x0007 2 0 R_ERR response for host-to-device non-data FIS

# hdparm -w /dev/sdd
/dev/sdd:
resetting drive
HDIO_DRIVE_RESET failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

# hdparm -B /dev/sdd
/dev/sdd:
APM_level = not supported

# hdparm -Z /dev/sdd
/dev/sdd:
disabling Seagate auto powersaving mode
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(seagatepwrsave) failed: Input/output error

# hdparm -M /dev/sdd
/dev/sdd:
acoustic = 208 (128=quiet ... 254=fast)

# hdparm -M 208 /dev/sdd
/dev/sdd:
setting acoustic management to 208
acoustic = 208 (128=quiet ... 254=fast)

The only think that keeps if from making noise is shutting it down via hdparm -y /dev/sdd


So, some questions:
1. Did the firmware screw it up? Can i flash the previous (CC38) version back?
2. Is the drive dying?
3. Was it a mistake to buy 2 new ST1000DM0003 (especially now that Samsung's disk division was acquired, that would be my second choice but now i wonder)?

The system has always run fine with an old Maxtor, which still works, and with this troublesome Seagate. It was only after i bought the new ones and upgraded the firmware that it all went belly-up.

Thanks for reading, any suggestions / technically founded opinions would be appreciated.
 
HI vBO

I don't have the answer to solve the problem but out of curiosity to learn something I didn't know before I began by checking the update firmware. According to the serials you've provided above the most recent updates don't use the same firmware.
http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/213891en
http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/223651en

I couldn't tell you whether that's at the root of the issues you've encountered but that seems a valid reason to keep it on the index of suspicion and in that line of thought Seagate will likely be the one to know and confirm if it's sufficient to screw up your planed RAID. Finally does the noisy disk remain erratic if run outside the RAID?
 
Hi Pibee,
Thanks for your reply.



Er... the original firmware version is CC38, the new firmware version for ST31000528AS (1TB) is CC49, as the links you provided confirm. This is the version i upgraded to.



This drive worked ok on a RAID1 with the Maxtor 6G160E0 (Maxtor DiamondMax 17, firmware KA101V00, 160GB). I haven't used it in RAID recently as i wanted a RAID solution that was symetric and i wanted to use this drive as file storage. It's Linux software RAID. Currently the drive only has an LVM partition.
 
Again with no presumption of any useful knowledge with Raid to guide either my own queries or offer a sound conclusive opinion of the config you have put together but I'm comparing the stat sheets of the two types of drives you've got and though some differences in drives may prove insignificant to certain Raid configs in this case... at performance level they are very different beasts.

Most recent buys are sata 6 the Maxtor sata3 with a caches at 8mb vs 64mb with the newer drives. I don't know if the other differences matter but where it might if I recall correctly, is that software raid doesn't offer you the option that Raid controllers do in those that have a built in cache where you can effectively suspend the hdd own cache in favor of the controllers.

I am biased (a curse) to believe that a concrete answer to the problem exist but I am becoming intuitively skeptical that that answer/info would change the outcome... and that is not fact based on actual experience in a comparable config, just a gut feeling, so I hope someone comes by to provide more than a gut feeling or you have a great deal of tenacity to continue searching.

Cheers v80

 


Definitely they are, but this is my home testbox, not a production server (or i'd have to throw in parity, chunk and stripe size, LVM data alignment, etc). Eh,maybe i'll consider RAID5 if i get a new disk.


However, my main question is: is this disk dying or can i fix it somehow through smart, hdparm or similar?

 
I don't know, I can say with certainty you are far more knowledgeable than I. I recently learned through a faulty bios I was specifically sent from ADATA for an ssd that with that technology... at least according to them... you can not roll back a bios, and yah I'm still pissed at them. However I don't assume that is also true with hdd's, I just don't know.

On the other hand if there is no reprieve from the disk behaving erratically it perhaps can be concluded you have a prime specimen to give something like hdparm a try.

The disadvantage is there's no database from which to draw from that might otherwise be useful with hdparn, as best I can tell it'll be a trial and error process and given the range of parameters it could be a challenging one with a high degree of risk. Re-reading the logs you posted it's difficult to assume whether there's physical damage or not. I would personally assume no and attempt something but only after I got the skinny on bios rollbacks from the manufacturer.
 
The drive was failling and got replaced. "Ticking" noise right after power on kinda gives it away.
(and i can't mark this as answered, so...)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.