Steve Jobs' Salary Was $1, But What About Tim Cook?

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
Looks to me like Mr. Cook chose the right line of work. He's not making this money off of taxes, but off of a valuable and highly sought after product. Kudos to him and all of his high salaried staff.
 
I find it interesting that no one has mentioned Jony. He is the actual "brain" behind the last Apple hits, iPhone, iPad and Air. Steve made sure that Jony's design was perfect but, who will work with him now? Tim is a numbers and operations guy, who will be the visionary?
 
He's not starving!?! What an insensitive thing to say about a man whose disease inhibits his body from absorbing nutrition and who, in fact, IS starving...to death. Why not ask someone with some common sense to proofread your comments before posting them publicly? Thank you.
 
I don't think it matters what he gets paid. CEO's of big companies tend to get insanely large bonuses and other compensation pay, that nearly always dwarf their actual pay.
 
[citation][nom]Twistdiff[/nom]I find it interesting that no one has mentioned Jony. He is the actual "brain" behind the last Apple hits, iPhone, iPad and Air. Steve made sure that Jony's design was perfect but, who will work with him now? Tim is a numbers and operations guy, who will be the visionary?[/citation]

Jony la gente está muy loca
 
[citation][nom]anony2004[/nom]$59 million last year? Isn't that a hell lot of money to earn?[/citation]

Yes, it obviously is, but you have to keep in mind how well Apple is doing, financially. The stock has done very well over the past few years and, as high-priced as it is, has room to go up further thanks to the company essentially dominating the tablet/smartphone market, along with Google. So, investors are reaping the benefits of Jobs'/Cook's assured stewardship of the company over the past decade. The mobile area is the future of computing, and Apple looks set to have a lion's share of the revenue, barring some catastrophic screw-up.

CEO compensation ideally should reflect the fiscal performance of the company which the CEO runs. To be sure, there are many CEO's earning salaries that are far out of proportion to their company's level of success, but Cook is not one of them.
 
At $1, he paid FICA of 8 cents (rounded). This is why ALL sources of income should be used in the FICA calculation, not just wages.
 
[citation][nom]forsty[/nom]At $1, he paid FICA of 8 cents (rounded). This is why ALL sources of income should be used in the FICA calculation, not just wages.[/citation]
now i get why he want that salary
 
So Jobs gets $1 a year and 5.5 million Apple shares.
Cook gets $52.33 million a year and lots of market shares.
(Bonuses not counted)

What the hell is up with Apple's money distribution!?
 
[citation][nom]aznshinobi[/nom]So... I hear we're in a recession again. Why are these CEO's being paid this much?[/citation]

It doesn't matter. If the company is willing to pay him that much then it's their business. If the stockholders complain then they can voice their concerns with them. Right now everybody within Apple is making money until we as consumers stop buying their products which isn't likely to happen anytime soon unless they royally screwed things up.

 
So they can afford to give 5 million dollar bonuses (I realize this isn't just Apple), but they can't afford to use labor in the same country they're living and selling in because it's "too costly"?

I'm not saying he shouldn't get a bonus, or that it shouldn't be fairly large given their success, but 5 million is enough for someone to live their entire life on. These corporations really need to let some of their wealth trickle down to their work force. More money trickling down is more money that people can spend on luxuries, which is more money that the business makes in the end. If the CEOs keep all the wealth for themselves, eventually the people who they expect to buy their products aren't even going to have enough money to buy them, their sales suffer, and the company fails. These guys just see dollar signs and figures and pat themselves on the back every time sales go up, even if it has nothing to do with them. Too bad that 5 million will become nothing but toilet paper when the currency devalues.
 
Considering how well Mr. Cook is doing I think he could share some of his largess with those poor slave wagers in China making the "crApple" iJunk at Foxconn.
 
Yes they can give out $5,000,000 bonuses and not be able to move manufacturing operations to the US. Yes they can pay the man who overseas day to day operations of the most valuable company in the world $60,000,000 in compensation but not move out of China.

Because this is not a fairy land, and the very idea that they can cut their COO's very well earned salary to shift manufacturing locations is retarded.

You guys need to stop reading the socialist propaganda and pick up a math book so you can understand how corporate finances work and how you can give an executive 5 mil, and yet not be able to spend an extra billion on manufacturing.

 
[citation][nom]kinggraves[/nom]So they can afford to give 5 million dollar bonuses (I realize this isn't just Apple), but they can't afford to use labor in the same country they're living and selling in because it's "too costly"?I'm not saying he shouldn't get a bonus, or that it shouldn't be fairly large given their success, but 5 million is enough for someone to live their entire life on. These corporations really need to let some of their wealth trickle down to their work force. More money trickling down is more money that people can spend on luxuries, which is more money that the business makes in the end. If the CEOs keep all the wealth for themselves, eventually the people who they expect to buy their products aren't even going to have enough money to buy them, their sales suffer, and the company fails. These guys just see dollar signs and figures and pat themselves on the back every time sales go up, even if it has nothing to do with them. Too bad that 5 million will become nothing but toilet paper when the currency devalues.[/citation]

There's this thing called "value", it's a measure of the contribution you make to the company's profits. They can afford to pay someone $5 million because his contribution results in an additional $500 million or $5 billion in revenues. On the other hand those workers in foreign countries do nothing to contribute to increased company revenues, they just maintain systems someone else created.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom