Submitting application for moderator

Solution
The requirements for and what you have to do to become a moderator are the same, participate in the community and be a good human being. You don't have to hit performance criteria, tick boxes or fill in forms.
Potential candidates are usually brought up by a Moderator who thinks they are a good fit for the position, and the rest of the Mods provide their opinions and discussion until a consensus is reached. There is a large human element involved, its not just a matter of having sufficient numbers.

Most I can say is keep answering questions, keep a level head in disputes and be yourself. If someone thinks your a good fit for the job, your name may be raised.
The requirements for and what you have to do to become a moderator are the same, participate in the community and be a good human being. You don't have to hit performance criteria, tick boxes or fill in forms.
Potential candidates are usually brought up by a Moderator who thinks they are a good fit for the position, and the rest of the Mods provide their opinions and discussion until a consensus is reached. There is a large human element involved, its not just a matter of having sufficient numbers.

Most I can say is keep answering questions, keep a level head in disputes and be yourself. If someone thinks your a good fit for the job, your name may be raised.
 
Solution


At the post office, someone had one of these, packaged just like this.
luters1.jpg


The mailperson slapped a Priority Mail sticker on it, and off it went. Just like this.
 


As a Hell's Angel is reported to have said when asked how someone becomes an Angel:
"They don't join, we reconize 'em!"
 
manofchalk hits the nail on the head here. I actually go through a whole host of criteria when it comes time to pick new moderators. I'd say a little more than half of them are people I hunt down here on the forums, and the rest are recommended through the current moderation team. In no particular order, the qualities I look for are seniority, sound judgment, reason under pressure, subject matter expertise, ability to work with others and on a team, ability to diffuse a situation, an eye for intent, activity, attitude and intelligence. Any and all of these factor in, and it's an informal process.

Usually, someone will be recommended, or I'll put forward a candidate I'm considering to the full moderation team for discussion and vetting. Each current moderator has the ability to veto a candidate for moderator, but if you veto, you have to support your veto with a reasoned argument and cite the merits of your recommendation against. Imbuing a standard user with extended powers is quite a big leap of faith, and we've had minor revolutions and major problems when a mod hasn't worked out after being brought onto the team. Safeguarding the community that is Tom's is my foremost priority, and the mod team is a critical piece of that.

Stick around for a bit. Who knows, you might well be on the list at some point. :)

-JP