Sun Microsystems Cuts 3,000 Staff Due to Delays

Status
Not open for further replies.

cyberkuberiah

Distinguished
May 5, 2009
812
0
19,010
but the eu delay is not the sole reason for layoffs . oracle doesn't wanna feed all the staff anyway after the acquisition is complete , so why not let sun itself do the cleanup ?
 

hellwig

Distinguished
May 29, 2008
1,743
0
19,860
The EU needs to get its head out of its ass. Oracle will not have a Database monopoly. First off, Microsoft relentlessly pushes SQL Server. PostgreSQL is a much better database than MySQL (and neither competes with Oracle anyway). And believe it or not, Sybase is still around too.
 

cookoy

Distinguished
Aug 3, 2009
1,324
0
19,280
3000 is a lot. Surely there would be some talented and skilled people among them. Oracle may want to look at their qualifications. Sun at this point may not be interested in keeping its people as all it wanted is to sell off the company and get it done with.
 

JMcEntegart

Splendid
Aug 25, 2007
8,445
0
30,780
[citation][nom]cyberkuberiah[/nom]but the eu delay is not the sole reason for layoffs . oracle doesn't wanna feed all the staff anyway after the acquisition is complete , so why not let sun itself do the cleanup ?[/citation]

True enough. It's not uncommon for companies to 'trim the fat' before an acquisition is finalised. That said, there's been tons of layoffs from Sun in the last year or so.
 

Pei-chen

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2007
1,258
0
19,280
They can all go work for Goldman Sachs. I heard Goldman is investing billion into a software that will not only manipulate the market like their current software but will manipulate the world.

Germany could declare war on France (to drive up German firm’s market value); India send troops to Iraq (decrease oil future); Canada have a communist revolution (wipe out all small investor) all at the click of a mouse.
 

hawkwindeb

Distinguished
Jul 14, 2006
76
1
18,630
Remember that last year Sun announced 5000-6000 would be laid-off and they have not burned through all them mostly cause of non-US country's policy requirements for long advanced notice to employees etc. So, since the Oracle transfer of ownweship/control has not happened within the time period expected sept-nov, seems reasonable to me to restate Sun's intentions as required by law.
 

lifelesspoet

Distinguished
Jun 2, 2009
192
0
18,680
I'm sorry, but am I the only one that is against market monopolies. Sure, laws and regulations slow down development but so do monopolies. More often then not, a company will do something dirty and blame a regulation to divert attention to the government.
Thumb me down if you want, but this has to be said. The government isn't perfect, but its suppose to protect us.
 

falchard

Distinguished
Jun 13, 2008
2,360
0
19,790
There is an easy way to deal with the European Union. Cut them off. The more companies that refuse to do business in Europe, the more likely European's will outcry.
 

martel80

Distinguished
Dec 8, 2006
368
0
18,780
[citation][nom]falchard[/nom]There is an easy way to deal with the European Union. Cut them off. The more companies that refuse to do business in Europe, the more likely European's will outcry.[/citation]
Like some global company would deliberately surrender the big market to its smaller competitors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.