Sure it's fine, it's your opinion.
But I'll just give my own. Considering I actually give links to facts/tests/threads, I consider my information more reliable for me.
I can't go around saying to people "why the heck would you get a seagate when 30 of my friends say WD is better", personal experience is great if you are face to face with a guy, but on the internet I prefer hard facts.
You can say what you want about the PSU to, but the fact is that the r9 280 will use 250w and the CPU will use 125w.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-750-ti-review,3750-21.html
This will be close to 400w + all your other stuff. The reason the graphics card companies overestimate wattage by so much is that there are SOOOOO many terrible PSUs in the market that they have to! Otherwise, someone would buy a 550w of a terrible brand and have it blow up in their face

So I would use this XFX 550w at stock, but not for any overclocking.
All 970 boards are created differently, look up the board I recommended, Heat sinked with 8+2 VRM. No problems with the 8320
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AgN1D79Joo7tdE9xMUFlMEVWeFhuckJEVF9aMmtpUFE&gid=3
Either way I respect your point of view but unless someone comes to me with facts to prove me otherwise I see nothing wrong with my recommendations in any threads.
One thing you could argue is that AM3+ is an old chipset and the newer intels are better. A few links to wikipedia would confirm this. Since devonVP made a 2nd thread about this subject, I made him an intel build for $800.
http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-2172696/good-build.html
Have a good day
