System Builder Marathon Q4 2015: $1055 Prosumer PC

Status
Not open for further replies.

3ogdy

Distinguished
Jul 13, 2009
717
2
19,165
77
Great build! Asus has mistakenly named their card "Asus GTX 970-OC-4GD5". It's actually an "Asus GTX 970-OC-3.5GD5". Let's not (edited) around.
The only thing I see affecting this build's usability (it's a prosumer config after all) is the lack of storage. 200GB (overprovisioning included) is too little by any standards. This build definitely needs a 2TB+ HDD.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff

Have you not heard of the cloud? Yeh, I said that tongue-in-cheek in the article as well, I really just wanted to build it cable-free.

The guys who said they do everything over the internet (to convince us to drop the optical drive) did give me a convenient excuse to go cable free though, thanks guys!
 

3ogdy

Distinguished
Jul 13, 2009
717
2
19,165
77
Never giving my data to other companies regardless of what the trends are like. I also retain access to my data without the need for a network connection.
My data is mine, unless of course there's a company like Seagate selling semi-faulty drives and then asking $1000+ for a recovery.

The cable free approach is definitely welcome. In my mind a prosumer needs more than 250GB locally, but most likely times are changing. I'll stick to my old ways though.
 

James Mason

Polypheme
Moderator
I don't think this build being capable of OCing is worth all the drawbacks it has.

And since you can BCLK OC the locked Skylakes now, the extra money saved with a non K chip would have made this build less misguided, and still given the "option" of OCing.
 

firefoxx04

Distinguished
Jan 23, 2009
1,371
1
19,660
144
Put data on the cloud? How exactly is one supposed to store 2TB of data and actively use it without decent Internet connection (Gbit)

For over $1000, I don't like the lack of case features, storage, power supply.

It's like putting a formula one engine into a cheep old van and trying to run it on pump gas. Cool at first but it's still a van.
 

3ogdy

Distinguished
Jul 13, 2009
717
2
19,165
77


The same way people over at Microsoft are increasing prices while cutting storage for OneDrive.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9759/microsoft-slashes-onedrive-storage-allotments
$24 a year for 50GB. What a poor joke. What a poor joke!!! Even my software kits occupy multiple times that.
Oh wait, it's just for photos and personal videos, right? Which ones? The ones taken with 2MP cameras? Even elderly relatives of mine can fill a 32GB microSD in a couple days of travelling and you offer 50GB a month for that money? Right....flash is cheaper than that, external HDDs are cheaper than that....and most importantly no idiot has access to them, including cops, Facebook or hackers searching for fame.
 

James Mason

Polypheme
Moderator


Eh, you get 1 TB free with an office 365 subscription.

One Drive is great/best used for documents really, but with a whole terabyte I could keep photos there... If I were the type who keeps photos digitally as opposed to physically.
 

killerofall

Distinguished
Mar 24, 2004
9
0
18,510
0
Cloud is still not viable for large amounts of storage due to cost. I can buy a 3TB HDD for less than $100 but to store that online it would cost at least $50 a year. Online storage is only great for backups at this time and good enough for only your most important data (~15GB or less). Using large amounts of online storage also requires a better than average internet connection. If you live out in the middle of nowhere then just forget even trying to use it.

You can not simply call this a "Prosumer PC" with the lack of local storage. If the budget was around $500 then maybe I could understand the lack of storage, but not at $800+. The only way I could recommend this system is if someone already has another PC or NAS in the house to augment the storage. Even simply adding a 1TB HDD for ~$50 would have been acceptable.
 
Rather have a R9 290 or 390 in a prosumer build. Many applications are able to take advantage of the compute power of these cards and with the money saved one could easily buy a power supply where you don't have to questions whether or not it'll fry.

The 970 is what I'd recommend if you were going to do serious overclocking. No way on a 400w unit.
 

improviz

Distinguished
Sep 28, 2006
43
0
18,530
0
I wish you'd be realistic and spec at least 500GB or, better, 1TB SSDs in your new high-end builds. I have a 500GB 840 Pro and it's still full and I have to install things on my D: drive. Of course, I do have Adobe CS6 Production Premium. And some animation programs. So maybe, more program overhead than some. But really, a 250GB SSD barely has room for any programs on it. The rest of the build is fine, although I'd go for more memory.
 

improviz

Distinguished
Sep 28, 2006
43
0
18,530
0
[/quotemsg]

Eh, you get 1 TB free with an office 365 subscription.

One Drive is great/best used for documents really, but with a whole terabyte I could keep photos there... If I were the type who keeps photos digitally as opposed to physically.[/quotemsg]

Eh, so, NOT "free". You're paying for it with your Office 365 subscription. Meh. I don't like the cloud, although I do use Carbonite. I have 4TB Raid1 data arrays, an external eSata dock that I can use for bare drives, and a 3TB WD My Book USB 3.0 (inexpensive card I dropped into my older PC). Even with a very fast Comcast Speed Blast 50mbs connection, the cloud doesn't excite me. Security issues aside, other than Google Docs and an FTP service (HighTail), I don't like the cloud all that much.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
I'm taking all comments about the power supply being too small as an indication that the person didn't read the article, or read the article and didn't care about the data presented. This isn't a religious debate, we actually have proof.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
All the drawbacks of being overclockable? Nobody said you had to overclock it.

Without chasing value through overclocking, I can't think of a good reason to go with a lower-model processor. More performance drawbacks. Or were you thinking of a 6600 non-K? Or were you thinking that the more-expensive CPU prevented me from using other high-end parts?

There was no budget limit, only a value target: The choice of CPU had nothing to do with any of the real drawbacks (cheap case, no hard drive). Better still, because I knew that a cheap case and lack of hard drive would give the machine an unfair advantage in the Day 4 "Complete System" value comparison, I'll add emphasis to the "Platform Value" chart in that article.

Our GPU-accelerated pro apps use OpenCL, it works great for that :) I actually look at the benchmark set before making any choices, but I didn't pick this specific card. The card was a reader decision from the last SBM that I found no good reason to reject.

 

Onus

Titan
Moderator
Choice of language should reflect that this is a family-friendly site. Criticism is fine; foul language is not. Thanks.

This build is excellent in an office environment (could be a home office) where some form of local data storage is available. The vapor is a huge source of uncertainty (including outright failure) and data compromise. Without that, additional hard drive space is needed, potentially a RAID1 array.
I loved the choice of PSU; SBM articles have been consistent in refuting the need for oversized PSUs with actual data. Well done.
 

cknobman

Distinguished
May 2, 2006
959
5
18,985
0
Interesting build but I just don't like the cuts you made to storage and the case.

For a prosumer build I think you went overkill on the graphics card.
You could have put in something like the 950 extreme (just reviewed) review here which would have gotten you 1080p gaming easy and then take all the saved money and use it for a HDD and better case.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
Sorry boss, if I said something naughty you should have PM'd me after removing it :)
How is the 950 doing in OpenCL? I think that's the primary factor in non-gaming graphics-assisted benchmarks. I'm not a GPU guru, so any advice is appreciated.

I didn't pick this 970, but may have if readers hadn't already recommend it in the last SBM response thread.


 


Autodesk doesn't support GTX 970 in any of their applications like Revit, 3ds Max, AutoCAD (I checked, all 2016 editions). Adobe doesn't support any Maxwell-based GeForce cards at all. I doubt that Dassault Systemés has ever supported GeForce cards. What "pro apps" were you talking about? Having certifications go beyond performance - you get extra features like RealView in SolidWorks and real-time rendering in Adobe video-editing applications.

And Onus, who were you referring to with the foul language?

As for the SSD, if it's enough for the programs and maybe some footage, it's good enough. That's because the professional infrastructure for video editing or 3D modeling is that a centralized server with a really powerful GPU and CPU would render and store the final file that uploads to other places. Workstations use captured footage, and after completing the work on the footage, they would be sent to the server to render.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
I picked up some performance in Photoshop's OpenCL filters and 3ds Max over the GTX 750 Ti so these apps are obviously using something of the card's abilities (even if they're not optimized for its newer architecture). Anandtech has an article on its compute capabilities, where it looks pretty good.

I remember when guys were modding their GeForce 2's to trick the OS into treating them as otherwise-identical Quadro models to gain huge benefits in Autodesk applications. This type of collusion (refusal by Autodesk to support the consumer card) would have me recommend that people who do these types of projects from home look for alternative application developers.

 

sauron18

Distinguished
Jul 20, 2007
13
0
18,510
0
I would prefer the i5 6500 now that the z170 can overclock non K CPU, i know the 6600k is a better procesor but $75 more for the same CPU, higher multiplier and uncloked. A saw a test on Digital Foundry from Euro Gamer they overclocked the 6500 to 4.5ghz for a $200 CPU.
 

Photoshop doesn't require much other than having OpenCL 2.0. That's one program out of many that require Quadro or older flagship GPUs for prosumers. So I really don't see your point. Photoshop is not all, the reason I bought a Lenovo P300 30AH004MUS (Xeon E3-1241 v3, Quadro K620) for $849 is because I'm getting a certified card in SolidWorks and I'm getting 8 threads, both of which may actually beat out your build in terms of features and multi-threaded loads. And my graphics card is the professional dialect of the OEM card GTX 745.

And also, as for the Quadro hardmod you're talking about, it doesn't work for Maxwell cards solely because the developer of the mod, gnif from EEVBlog, hasn't been on the forums recently. So far it works on GTX 770, GTX Titan Black, GTX 690, GTX 680, GTX 660 Ti, and a couple of cards that has the Quadro correspondent. Older flagship cards are hard to get and very expensive, but lacking the performance of today's GPU of the same level.

The GTX 970 is theoretically capable of the mod, but until someone gets a Quadro M5000 and figures out how the process goes, the reply to your second paragraph is no.
 

RedJaron

Splendid
Moderator
While I use cloud storage for a lot of things, I use it to sync files between machines where a copy of the file is still stored locally. While I know some people don't have internet connections suitable for massive file storage online, I would think a prosumer would make that a priority if at all possible. So I can understand the assumption that the cloud would be good enough for mass storage. Personally I would still opt for a big local drive. I can keep my current projects local and use network/cloud storage for archiving.
 

Crashman

Polypheme
Former Staff
I didn't leave a question, so I guess the answer must be yes? Will we next be discussing the meaning of life?

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ASK THE COMMUNITY