G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.magic.rules (More info?)
Hi all!
Me and my friends have some different opinions about tapping/summoning
sickness, and we would like to know who is right and who is wrong:
Player A permanents:
5 tapped Swamps
1 untapped Shepherd of Rot (has summoning sickness)
1 untapped Zombie Trailblazer (has summoning sickness)
Player B permanents:
4 untapped Islands
1 untapped Puppeteer (no summoning sickness)
It's now Main Phase of Player A. He has just summoned Shepherd of Rot and
Zombie Trailblazer.
Zombie Trailblazer
Color= Black
Type= Creature - Zombie
Cost= BBB
TO(U)
Text (TO+errata): 2/2. ; Tap an untapped Zombie you control: Target land
becomes a Swamp until end of turn. ; Tap an untapped Zombie you control:
Target creature gains swampwalk until end of turn. [Oracle 2003/07/01]
Shepherd of Rot
Color= Black
Type= Creature - Zombie Cleric
Cost= 1B
ON(C)
Text (ON): 1/1. ; {Tap}: Each player loses 1 life for each Zombie in play.
Puppeteer
Color= Blue
Type= Creature - Wizard
Cost= 2U
OD(U)/8(U)
Text (OD/8th): 1/2. ; {U},{Tap}: Tap or untap target creature.
We found in rules:
G19.27a - The term "summoning sickness" is an informal term which describes
a creature's inability to attack or to use activated abilities that include
the tap symbol when it has come under a player's control since the
beginning of that player's most recent turn. [CompRules 2003/07/01]
Which of following statements are true/false in this situation?
1. Player B can pay U and tap Puppeteer to tap Shepherd of Rot or Zombie
Trailblazer.
2. Player A cannot tap Shepherd of Rot to use Shepherd's ability.
3. Player A cannot tap Zombie Trailblazer to use one of Zombie
Trailblazer's abilities
4. Player A cannot tap Shepherd of Rot to use one of Zombie Trailblazer's
abilities
Thanks for help in advance!
--
Maciej "Sasha" Zalewski
GG# 1850769
mail: josif[WYTNIJTO]@klub.chip.pl
z mojego maila usuñ ca³y nawias kwadratowy
Hi all!
Me and my friends have some different opinions about tapping/summoning
sickness, and we would like to know who is right and who is wrong:
Player A permanents:
5 tapped Swamps
1 untapped Shepherd of Rot (has summoning sickness)
1 untapped Zombie Trailblazer (has summoning sickness)
Player B permanents:
4 untapped Islands
1 untapped Puppeteer (no summoning sickness)
It's now Main Phase of Player A. He has just summoned Shepherd of Rot and
Zombie Trailblazer.
Zombie Trailblazer
Color= Black
Type= Creature - Zombie
Cost= BBB
TO(U)
Text (TO+errata): 2/2. ; Tap an untapped Zombie you control: Target land
becomes a Swamp until end of turn. ; Tap an untapped Zombie you control:
Target creature gains swampwalk until end of turn. [Oracle 2003/07/01]
Shepherd of Rot
Color= Black
Type= Creature - Zombie Cleric
Cost= 1B
ON(C)
Text (ON): 1/1. ; {Tap}: Each player loses 1 life for each Zombie in play.
Puppeteer
Color= Blue
Type= Creature - Wizard
Cost= 2U
OD(U)/8(U)
Text (OD/8th): 1/2. ; {U},{Tap}: Tap or untap target creature.
We found in rules:
G19.27a - The term "summoning sickness" is an informal term which describes
a creature's inability to attack or to use activated abilities that include
the tap symbol when it has come under a player's control since the
beginning of that player's most recent turn. [CompRules 2003/07/01]
Which of following statements are true/false in this situation?
1. Player B can pay U and tap Puppeteer to tap Shepherd of Rot or Zombie
Trailblazer.
2. Player A cannot tap Shepherd of Rot to use Shepherd's ability.
3. Player A cannot tap Zombie Trailblazer to use one of Zombie
Trailblazer's abilities
4. Player A cannot tap Shepherd of Rot to use one of Zombie Trailblazer's
abilities
Thanks for help in advance!
--
Maciej "Sasha" Zalewski
GG# 1850769
mail: josif[WYTNIJTO]@klub.chip.pl
z mojego maila usuñ ca³y nawias kwadratowy
