Have we beat this dead horse long enough yet? lol
Yes
<font color=orange>Quarter</font color=orange> <font color=blue>Pounder</font color=blue> <font color=orange>Inside</font color=orange>
Have we beat this dead horse long enough yet? lol
please don't make a contrast of someones knowedge because they are a newbie
ATHLONS CAN!! BE RAN AT 3GHZ I SEE IT ALL THE TIME, GO TO MADONION.com THERE ARE ABOUT 10 or 11 of them registerd on that site.
The processor will perform the same, but it will have more bandwidth available to it if it were to have the 1000MHz FSB. This would allow it to fetch data more quickly. However, if your RAM were running at 10MHz (asynchronously, or with a 1/100 divider on the 1000MHz FSB system), then both systems would perform identically.Do you think a CPU with a 1000MHz FSB and a multiplier of 3 will perform the same as a CPU with a 10MHz FSB and a multiplier of 300?
dude give it up please. why is it after every few posts you make, you see an athlon that goes 300mhz higher than before? first it was "i've seen athlons@ 2400mhz", then it was "dude theirs tons of people running them at 2700mhz". and now they've reached 3 ghz?ATHLONS CAN!! BE RAN AT 3GHZ I SEE IT ALL THE TIME
Linearity is a property of the chosen benchmark, not the processor. A 3Ghz Pentium4, or any other processor, is 50% faster than a 2GHz dito; no more, and no less.I was shocked to see that the P4 running 50% faster performs only 10-20% better, at best.
Yes, I would bet on that too, but how about a PR3000@2333Mhz?It is obvious that an Athlon running at 3 ghz would (and will) absolutely destroy a P4 at 3 ghz.
If the Pentium 4 were to have a higher IPC it would further 'rape' the Athlons. "What if"s count for nothing...it doesn't change the fact that if they were to go that fast they would rape the P4
Who decides which architecture is superior? Frequency is just as important as IPC. A processor with poor frequency scaling is just as bad as a processor with poor IPC.AMD is taking easy realying on their superior archetecture to save them
That is a matter of opinion. I will take this as your opinion. However, that does not mean it is true.amd is the one with the better chip
What is wrong with liking Intel? In fact, what is wrong with being right-wing anyhow? You would not happen to be a democrat/liberal, would you? Those are the people who love high taxes and money-wasting. At any rate, this is not a political forum. If you want to debate this, point out a political forum and I have no doubt we could have a raging 'discussion' on this.they almost sound like right wing intel lovers sometimes.
If you want me to stop posting counter-points, then stop giving me such incredibly easy points to counter.ok your just finding something to argue about now
Point out a single one that has a definition in the quote that is different than its meaning within the context of the full post. There is not a single case of this.please stop the picking apart of what i say. Those run ons are not complete without the sentence that follows it.
Not really. I am countering the points you are making to show that they are incorrect or just opinion.Your ripping apart what I say so you can argue some more.
If you want to end this, then just stop posting. Do you see the little 'X' in the upper right-hand corner of this window? ...just stop, I want to end this and your "picking apart" insn't helping.