Review TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan Eco DDR5-6000 C30 2x16GB Review: Eco-Friendly DDR5 Performance

"As often happens, the Vulcan Eco memory kit couldn't keep up with performance on the AMD platform."

What do you mean by that, and why does this "often happen"? And are these not ultimately just measurement variations (as indicated also by the kit taking the top spot in gaming performance on the same system)? Or is AMD more picky and complicated about selecting RAM?
In any case, if you think this is a common phenomenon, it would be worth clearer sentences.
 
"As often happens, the Vulcan Eco memory kit couldn't keep up with performance on the AMD platform."

What do you mean by that, and why does this "often happen"? And are these not ultimately just measurement variations (as indicated also by the kit taking the top spot in gaming performance on the same system)? Or is AMD more picky and complicated about selecting RAM?
In any case, if you think this is a common phenomenon, it would be worth clearer sentences.
The remark doesn't make sense. In comparison to the Intel system, the ECO scored lower on the AMD system, but so did every other kit tested, and the ECO was a measly 10 points lower than the highest score. And since the ECO won in gaming, overall, I'd call it the winner among the kits tested. However, the review is correct about pricing, as the T-CREATE EXPERT has the same specs and costs less. And there are even cheaper DDR5-6000 CL30 kits, albeit with slightly looser timings.