The best way to share ethernet about 150m. wireless connection preferred

[lejolasho]

Hello.
My neighbor is about 150mb away and I want to share ethernet. Cat6 cable is expensive and there is a risk of damaging it.
I also think, that sharing ethernet via cat5 cable is not possible at that far distance and I can not place switch or anything between in order to strengthen the signal.
Now i think, that wireless connection is the best option, but don't have experience in this field. What would you suggest?
Any help will be appreciated.

 

[popatim]

Thats way to far for consumer grade equipment; cat6 might be the cheapest option if you have the manpower to bury the line.

You might want to give something like this a try:
http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-PicoStation-2-4GHz-802-11g-Access/dp/B0055PKSG6

 

[lejolasho]

Thank you for the reply, I have got interested in http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-PicoStation-2-4GHz-802-11g-Access/dp/B0055PKSG6 wireless access point, but have one question.

Will it catch a wifi signal of an ordinary wifi modem (router) from 100-150 meters, where is not a direct view? (there are one building as an obstacle.) or I will need a pair of them in order to work properly?

 

[abailey]

I would not use the Picostation. The picostation is omni directional and based on older technology. If you are going to use wireless I would use a wireless bridge. Ubiquiti makes a Nanostation Loco that works well for wireless bridges. They make both a 2.4Ghz and a 5Ghz model. The 5Ghz model is preferable if you have line of site, or if you live in a neighborhood with other houses as the 2.4Ghz band will be crowded. You would need a Nonstation at each house.
5Ghz: http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-US-FCC-NSLOCOM5-NanoStation-loco/dp/B004EHSV4W/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1404309243&sr=8-2&keywords=nanostation+loco
2.4Ghz: http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-LOCOM2-US-NanoStation-loco-M2/dp/B004EGI3CI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1404309243&sr=8-1&keywords=nanostation+loco

If running a cable is an option I would seriously consider that if I were you. Especially if you do not have line of site. It sounds like Cat5 or even Cat6 is not going to work for your distance. You could run a RG6 COAX line and use a pair of these to make the connection: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00684E0UI/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=3P06TDB3CDPD0&coliid=IWOQNTKXTP4X3
That conection would be much better than a wireless solution.