A competition ISP sent marketing folks to my neighborhood who state that they have recently installed dedicated fiber optic lines.
According to them, the line is basically immune to slow down from traffic (from heavy usage time etc.), and that I would notice increase and consistency in internet speed.
They claim that 20mbps of fiber speed is faster than the 50-60mbps offered by the cable line ISP, and that their fiber line megabit per second value is 8-10 times greater than that of the cable line.
The marketer believes that their 20mbps speed would equal around 200mbps speed on the cable line.
Do these claims hold any weight? Why do they market with 20mbps sticker if they're so confident of the fiber's overall superiority to that of the cable lines?
Does that mean that when I run speedtest with the fiber line, the speed would show up as 20mbps but somehow it will rival the speed of 200mbps on cable line? Could there be a significant difference in ping speed and does it matter? What am I missing here?
According to them, the line is basically immune to slow down from traffic (from heavy usage time etc.), and that I would notice increase and consistency in internet speed.
They claim that 20mbps of fiber speed is faster than the 50-60mbps offered by the cable line ISP, and that their fiber line megabit per second value is 8-10 times greater than that of the cable line.
The marketer believes that their 20mbps speed would equal around 200mbps speed on the cable line.
Do these claims hold any weight? Why do they market with 20mbps sticker if they're so confident of the fiber's overall superiority to that of the cable lines?
Does that mean that when I run speedtest with the fiber line, the speed would show up as 20mbps but somehow it will rival the speed of 200mbps on cable line? Could there be a significant difference in ping speed and does it matter? What am I missing here?