the REAL debate: NVidia vs onboard video

sargeduck

Distinguished
Aug 27, 2002
407
0
18,780
Kinda of an odd question. Definetly Nvidia. Although Nvidia's had a lot of problems with lying, and cheating and being dishonest, there vid cards up to and inclucing the geforce 4 TI were excellent cards. Their fx line, is well, to put it gently, crap. However, even the fx line is WAY better than onboard.


As each day goes by, I hug my 9600Pro just a little tighter.
 

barnettgs

Distinguished
Aug 13, 2003
85
0
18,630
Onboard video? *cough*

It sounds as if you have no choice but had to settle for Nvidia's nearest and lowest rival, which is onboard video when it can't even complete with ATI? :lol:
 

kinney

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2001
2,263
18
19,785
It depends on whether the NVidia cards are OPTIMIZED!!!

Umm OK.

Just as my Radeon 9800 is OPTIMIZED?

fanATICs are getting out of control around here.

Athlon 1700+, Epox 8RDA (NForce2), Maxtor Diamondmax Plus 9 80GB 8MB cache, 2x256mb Crucial PC2100 in Dual DDR, Radeon 9800NP, Audigy, Z560s, MX500
 

daddywags214

Distinguished
Mar 30, 2003
939
0
18,980
No kidding... I mean come on guys, it's obvious that ATi wins this round, but you can't realistically compare onboard video to a tried and true high end card, crappy as though it may be.

<b>nVidia cheated on me so I left her for ATi. ATi's hotter anyway...</b>
 

eden

Champion
I have to point at the lack of humor here. It was clearly an attempt to make a hyperbole.

--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/album.html" target="_new"><font color=blue><b>Are you ugly and looking into showing your mug? Then the THGC Album is the right place for you!</b></font color=blue></A><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Eden on 09/20/03 06:35 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

kinney

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2001
2,263
18
19,785
Yeah. Basically if you couldnt get an ATI, Nvidia is still your next best choice.

But comparing onboard to NV is a nice low-blow smear campaign that I shouldnt have put past the fanboys at THGC.

Athlon 1700+, Epox 8RDA (NForce2), Maxtor Diamondmax Plus 9 80GB 8MB cache, 2x256mb Crucial PC2100 in Dual DDR, Radeon 9800NP, Audigy, Z560s, MX500
 

eden

Champion
ROFL, GW's on his morning PMS. :wink:

--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/album.html" target="_new"><font color=blue><b>Are you ugly and looking into showing your mug? Then the THGC Album is the right place for you!</b></font color=blue></A>
 

kinney

Distinguished
Sep 24, 2001
2,263
18
19,785
Sorry THG guard dog

Athlon 1700+, Epox 8RDA (NForce2), Maxtor Diamondmax Plus 9 80GB 8MB cache, 2x256mb Crucial PC2100 in Dual DDR, Radeon 9800NP, Audigy, Z560s, MX500
 

ufo_warviper

Distinguished
Dec 30, 2001
3,033
0
20,780
Are you kidding? Intel Extreme Graphics slaughterz all! Don't listen to those add-in card fanatics. Tom's hiding the <i>REAL</i> benchmarks becuase he knows how pissed all of you would be when your ATI/nVidia cards gets trampled by the inexpensive integrated Intel Extreme chip.

My OS features preemptive multitasking, a fully interactive command line, & support for 640K of RAM!
 

Gastrian

Distinguished
May 26, 2003
169
0
18,680
Well nVidia would win either way. They've got the best onbaord graphics out there or at least until ATI bring out their new one.

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Gastrian on 09/21/03 11:29 AM.</EM></FONT></P>